SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Stakeholders’ views on an institutional dashboard with metrics for responsible research
16 references·0 citing·54 second hopsampled
Stakeholders’ views on an institutional dashboard with metrics for responsible research (2022)Stakeholders’ views on an institutional d…Assessment of transparency indicators across the biomedical literature: How open is open? (2021)Assessment of transparency in…The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity (2020)The Hong Kong Principles for …Academic criteria for promotion and tenure in biomedical sciences faculties: cross sectional analysis of international sample of universities (2020)Academic criteria for promoti…Assessing scientists for hiring, promotion, and tenure (2018)Assessing scientists for hiri…Academic Misconduct, Misrepresentation and Gaming: A Reassessment (2018)Academic Misconduct, Misrepre…Current Incentives for Scientists Lead to Underpowered Studies with Erroneous Conclusions (2016)Current Incentives for Scient…Robust research: Institutions must do their part for reproducibility (2015)Robust research: Institutions…Promoting an open research culture (2015)Promoting an open research cu…Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics (2015)Bibliometrics: The Leiden Man…Are We There Yet? Data Saturation in Qualitative Research (2015)Are We There Yet? Data Satura…How to Make More Published Research True (2014)How to Make More Published Re…Purposeful Sampling for Qualitative Data Collection and Analysis in Mixed Method Implementation Research (2013)Purposeful Sampling for Quali…The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)The Cochrane Collaboration's …The qualitative content analysis process (2008)The qualitative content analy…Research Synthesis: The Practice of Cognitive Interviewing (2007)Research Synthesis: The Pract…Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups (2007)Consolidated criteria for rep…The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. (1979)False-Positive Psychology (2011)Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling (2012)Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (2015)Meta-analysis and the science of research synthesis (2018)The Research Act: A Theoretical Introduction to Sociological Methods (1979)Qualitative Interviewing: The Art of Hearing Data (1996)How Many Interviews Are Enough? (2005)Code Saturation Versus Meaning Saturation (2016)Saturation in qualitative research: exploring its conceptualization and operationalization (2017)To saturate or not to saturate? Questioning data saturation as a useful concept for thematic analysis and sample-size rationales (2019)Content Analysis: An Introduction to its Methodology. (1984)Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook (1994)Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis (2005)Content analysis and thematic analysis: Implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study (2013)Qualitative Content Analysis (2014)The Circular Economy – A new sustainability paradigm? (2016)Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor (2006)The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact? (2015)Science Mapping: A Systematic Review of the Literature (2017)Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World (2021)Confirmation Bias: A Ubiquitous Phenomenon in Many Guises (1998)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta‐analyses (2016)COSMIN reporting guideline for studies on measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures (2021)The Discovery of Grounded Theory; Strategies for Qualitative Research (1968)THE DISCOVERY OF GROUNDED THEORY: STRATEGIES FOR QUALITATIVE RESEARCH. By Barney G. Glaser and Anselm L. Strauss. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company, 1967. 271 pp. $6.75 (1968)Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists (1987)Validity, reliability, and generalizability in qualitative research (2015)Purposive sampling: complex or simple? Research case examples (2020)Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. (1977)Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. (1992)Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques (1993)Qualitative research and content validity: developing best practices based on science and experience (2009)Sample size for pre-tests of questionnaires (2014)Best Practices for Developing and Validating Scales for Health, Social, and Behavioral Research: A Primer (2018)Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials (2001)Assessing Risk of Bias in Included Studies (2008)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions (2016)RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2019)Two new Later Stone Age sites from the Final Pleistocene in the Falémé Valley, eastern Senegal (2024)Handbook of Qualitative Research (1994)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research (2014)Thematic Analysis (2017)Scholarship Reconsidered: Priorities of the Professoriate (1992)A manifesto for reproducible science (2017)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta‐analyses in ecology and evolutionary biology: a PRISMA extension (2021)Prevalence of questionable research practices, research misconduct and their potential explanatory factors: A survey among academic researchers in The Netherlands (2022)A typology of validity: content, face, convergent, discriminant, nomological and predictive validity (2024)
this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

  • 2007Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups44,622 cited
  • 2011The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials33,820 cited
  • 2008The qualitative content analysis process26,312 cited
  • 2013Purposeful Sampling for Qualitative Data Collection and Analysis in Mixed Method Implementation Research16,896 cited
  • 2015Are We There Yet? Data Saturation in Qualitative Research5,073 cited
  • 2015Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics3,281 cited
  • 2015Promoting an open research culture2,923 cited
  • 2007Research Synthesis: The Practice of Cognitive Interviewing1,634 cited
  • 2014How to Make More Published Research True803 cited
  • 2020The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity571 cited
  • 2018Assessing scientists for hiring, promotion, and tenure502 cited
  • 2020Academic criteria for promotion and tenure in biomedical sciences faculties: cross sectional analysis of international sample of universities241 cited
  • 2016Current Incentives for Scientists Lead to Underpowered Studies with Erroneous Conclusions193 cited
  • 2015Robust research: Institutions must do their part for reproducibility157 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2021Assessment of transparency indicators across the biomedical literature: How open is open?139 cited
  • 2018Academic Misconduct, Misrepresentation and Gaming: A Reassessment130 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.