SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Assessment of blinding in randomized controlled trials of antidepressants for depressive disorders 2000–2020: A systematic review and meta-analysis
12 references·4 citing·41 second hop
Assessment of blinding in randomized controlled trials of antidepressants for depressive disorders 2000–2020: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2022)Assessment of blinding in randomized cont…Blinding and expectancy confounds in psychedelic randomized controlled trials (2021)Blinding and expectancy confo…Association Between Risk-of-Bias Assessments and Results of Randomized Trials in Cochrane Reviews: The ROBES Meta-Epidemiologic Study (2017)Association Between Risk-of-B…Systematic Review of Blinding Assessment in Randomized Controlled Trials in Schizophrenia and Affective Disorders 2000-2010 (2013)Systematic Review of Blinding…Meta-analysis of Cohen’s kappa (2011)Meta-analysis of Cohen’s kappaConducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package (2010)Conducting Meta-Analyses in R…Empirical evidence of bias in treatment effect estimates in controlled trials with different interventions and outcomes: meta-epidemiological study (2008)Empirical evidence of bias in…Contour-enhanced meta-analysis funnel plots help distinguish publication bias from other causes of asymmetry (2008)Contour-enhanced meta-analysi…Blinded trials taken to the test: an analysis of randomized clinical trials that report tests for the success of blinding (2007)Blinded trials taken to the t…Imputing missing standard deviations in meta-analyses can provide accurate results (2005)Imputing missing standard dev…Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Empirical evidence of bias. D…Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Empirical Evidence of BiasThe Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)The Measurement of Observer A…Operationalization of Cochrane’s Risk of Bias 2 Tool (RoB 2) in the Context of Psychotherapy Trials (2025)Operationalization of Cochran…Methodological and reporting recommendations for clinical trials in Nutritional Psychiatry: Guidelines from the International Society for Nutritional Psychiatry Research (2024)Methodological and reporting …Influence of lack of blinding on the estimation of medication-related harms: a retrospective cohort study of randomized controlled trials (2024)Influence of lack of blinding…Current concerns on journal article with preprint: Anesthesia and Pain Medicine perspectives (2023)Current concerns on journal a…A RATING SCALE FOR DEPRESSION (1960)A New Depression Scale Designed to be Sensitive to Change (1979)Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Recent developments in meta‐analysis (2007)Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction for Stress Management in Healthy People: A Review and Meta-Analysis (2009)Choosing effect measures and computing estimates of effect (2019)A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales (1960)The anatomy of an award-winning meta-analysis: Recommendations for authors, reviewers, and readers of meta-analytic reviews (2021)The use of intercoder reliability in qualitative interview data analysis in science education (2021)Can large language models replace humans in systematic reviews? Evaluating GPT ‐4's efficacy in screening and extracting data from peer‐reviewed and grey literature in multiple languages (2024)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis (2002)Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (2015)How to perform a meta-analysis with R: a practical tutorial (2019)PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Assessing Risk of Bias in Included Studies (2008)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care (2010)GRADE guidelines: 4. Rating the quality of evidence—study limitations (risk of bias) (2011)Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. (1994)Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School-Age Children-Present and Lifetime Version (K-SADS-PL): Initial Reliability and Validity Data (1997)The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. (1998)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015)RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2019)Operating Characteristics of a Rank Correlation Test for Publication Bias (1994)Trim and Fill: A Simple Funnel‐Plot–Based Method of Testing and Adjusting for Publication Bias in Meta‐Analysis (2000)Social Relationships and Mortality Risk: A Meta-analytic Review (2010)GRADE guidelines: 5. Rating the quality of evidence—publication bias (2011)Quantifying Publication Bias in Meta-Analysis (2017)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)Research Review: The effects of mindfulness‐based interventions on cognition and mental health in children and adolescents – a meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials (2018)Efficacy of cognitive bias modification interventions in anxiety and depressive disorders: a systematic review and network meta-analysis (2020)Impact of blinding on estimated treatment effects in randomised clinical trials: meta-epidemiological study (2020)Psychometric properties of the credibility/expectancy questionnaire (2000)External validity of randomised controlled trials: “To whom do the results of this trial apply?” (2005)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Adverse events in clinical treatments with serotonergic psychedelics and MDMA: A mixed-methods systematic review (2022)Great Expectations: recommendations for improving the methodological rigor of psychedelic clinical trials (2022)Psychedelic-Assisted Psychotherapy—A Systematic Review of Associated Psychological Interventions (2022)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1977The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data81,000 cited
  • 2010Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package20,412 cited
  • 1995Empirical Evidence of Bias5,632 cited
  • 1995Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials5,560 cited
  • 2008Empirical evidence of bias in treatment effect estimates in controlled trials with different interventions and outcomes: meta-epidemiological study2,534 cited
  • 2008Contour-enhanced meta-analysis funnel plots help distinguish publication bias from other causes of asymmetry2,046 cited
  • 2005Imputing missing standard deviations in meta-analyses can provide accurate results1,567 cited
  • 2017Association Between Risk-of-Bias Assessments and Results of Randomized Trials in Cochrane Reviews: The ROBES Meta-Epidemiologic Study381 cited
  • 2021Blinding and expectancy confounds in psychedelic randomized controlled trials319 cited
  • 2011Meta-analysis of Cohen’s kappa282 cited
  • 2007Blinded trials taken to the test: an analysis of randomized clinical trials that report tests for the success of blinding205 cited
  • 2013Systematic Review of Blinding Assessment in Randomized Controlled Trials in Schizophrenia and Affective Disorders 2000-201085 cited

Cited by

  • 2024Influence of lack of blinding on the estimation of medication-related harms: a retrospective cohort study of randomized controlled trials

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

14 cited
  • 2025Operationalization of Cochrane’s Risk of Bias 2 Tool (RoB 2) in the Context of Psychotherapy Trials14 cited
  • 2024Methodological and reporting recommendations for clinical trials in Nutritional Psychiatry: Guidelines from the International Society for Nutritional Psychiatry Research11 cited
  • 2023Current concerns on journal article with preprint: Anesthesia and Pain Medicine perspectives8 cited