SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Giving Digital Mental Health Technologies the Benefit of the Doubt, Rather than Doubting the Benefits
6 references·0 citing·31 second hop
Giving Digital Mental Health Technologies the Benefit of the Doubt, Rather than Doubting the Benefits (2022)Giving Digital Mental Health Technologies…Is There an App for That?: Ethical Issues in the Digital Mental Health Response to COVID-19 (2021)Is There an App for That?: Et…A Research Agenda for Hybrid Intelligence: Augmenting Human Intellect With Collaborative, Adaptive, Responsible, and Explainable Artificial Intelligence (2020)A Research Agenda for Hybrid …The efficacy of app‐supported smartphone interventions for mental health problems: a meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials (2019)The efficacy of app‐supported…The efficacy of smartphone‐based mental health interventions for depressive symptoms: a meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials (2017)The efficacy of smartphone‐ba…Delivering Cognitive Behavior Therapy to Young Adults With Symptoms of Depression and Anxiety Using a Fully Automated Conversational Agent (Woebot): A Randomized Controlled Trial (2017)Delivering Cognitive Behavior…Can smartphone mental health interventions reduce symptoms of anxiety? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (2017)Can smartphone mental health …Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Standalone smartphone apps for mental health—a systematic review and meta-analysis (2019)Effectiveness and Safety of Using Chatbots to Improve Mental Health: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (2020)An overview of and recommendations for more accessible digital mental health services (2022)Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. (1988)The PHQ-9 (2001)Using thematic analysis in psychology (2006)An Empathy-Driven, Conversational Artificial Intelligence Agent (Wysa) for Digital Mental Well-Being: Real-World Data Evaluation Mixed-Methods Study (2018)Chatbots and Conversational Agents in Mental Health: A Review of the Psychiatric Landscape (2019)Your Robot Therapist Will See You Now: Ethical Implications of Embodied Artificial Intelligence in Psychiatry, Psychology, and Psychotherapy (2019)The CES-D Scale (1977)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Digital Mental Health and COVID-19: Using Technology Today to Accelerate the Curve on Access and Quality Tomorrow (2020)The Economic Burden of Adults with Major Depressive Disorder in the United States (2010 and 2018) (2021)A power primer. (1992)Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis (2002)Introduction to Meta‐Analysis (2009)Artificially intelligent chatbots in digital mental health interventions: a review (2021)Systematic review and meta-analysis of AI-based conversational agents for promoting mental health and well-being (2023)Human Factors of the Confirmation Bias in Intelligence Analysis: Decision Support From Graphical Evidence Landscapes (2008)Handbook of Ethics, Values, and Technological Design (2015)Meaningful human control: actionable properties for AI system development (2022)Human-AI Ensembles: When Can They Work? (2023)A sociotechnical system perspective on AI (2024)Mental Health, Substance Use, and Suicidal Ideation During the COVID-19 Pandemic — United States, June 24–30, 2020 (2020)Multidisciplinary research priorities for the COVID-19 pandemic: a call for action for mental health science (2020)Effectiveness of chatbots on COVID vaccine confidence and acceptance in Thailand, Hong Kong, and Singapore (2023)Exploring the societal implications of digital mental health technologies: A critical review (2024)Beyond Doomsday Fears: Why We Need to Consider the Potential Harms of AI Psychotherapy (2025)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2017Delivering Cognitive Behavior Therapy to Young Adults With Symptoms of Depression and Anxiety Using a Fully Automated Conversational Agent (Woebot): A Randomized Controlled Trial2,713 cited
  • 2017The efficacy of smartphone‐based mental health interventions for depressive symptoms: a meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials1,094 cited
  • 2019The efficacy of app‐supported smartphone interventions for mental health problems: a meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials807 cited
  • 2017Can smartphone mental health interventions reduce symptoms of anxiety? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials673 cited
  • 2020A Research Agenda for Hybrid Intelligence: Augmenting Human Intellect With Collaborative, Adaptive, Responsible, and Explainable Artificial Intelligence412 cited
  • 2021Is There an App for That?: Ethical Issues in the Digital Mental Health Response to COVID-1964 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work