The end justifies all means: questionable conversion of different effect sizes to a common effect size measure

Marcel A. L. M. van Assen · Andrea Helena Stoevenbelt · Robbie C. M. van Aert

8 citations0/0 files storedReligion Brain & Behavior

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Meta-analysis and systematic reviews Psychology Research and Bibliometrics Reliability and Agreement in Measurement

Abstract

The main goal of meta-science projects (e.g., Open Science Collaboration, 2015; The MARP Team, 2022) is drawing overarching conclusions by combining the observed statistical evidence. This correspo...

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 8 citations exist upstream.

References

2009Introduction to Meta‐Analysis 2000Practical Meta-Analysis 2015Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science 2003Effect-Size Indices for Dichotomized Outcomes in Meta-Analysis.2019Including non‐randomized studies on intervention effects 2016Estimation of the biserial correlation and its sampling variance for use in meta‐analysis 2022A Many-Analysts Approach to the Relation Between Religiosity and Well-being

Cited by

2024Bayesian evidence synthesis as a flexible alternative to meta-analysis: A simulation study and empirical demonstration

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.