SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Authorship Issues When Articles are Retracted Due to Research Misconduct and Then Resubmitted
16 references·1 citing·28 second hop
Authorship Issues When Articles are Retracted Due to Research Misconduct and Then Resubmitted (2022)Authorship Issues When Articles are Retra…Responsible Conduct of Research (2022)Responsible Conduct of Resear…European Science Editing (2020)European Science EditingTransparency in authors’ contributions and responsibilities to promote integrity in scientific publication (2018)Transparency in authors’ cont…FOSTERING INTEGRITY IN RESEARCH (2017)FOSTERING INTEGRITY IN RESEAR…Why articles are retracted: a retrospective cross-sectional study of retraction notices at BioMed Central (2016)Why articles are retracted: a…Beyond authorship: attribution, contribution, collaboration, and credit (2015)Beyond authorship: attributio…Why Has the Number of Scientific Retractions Increased? (2013)Why Has the Number of Scienti…Why Growing Retractions Are (Mostly) a Good Sign (2013)Why Growing Retractions Are (…Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications (2012)Misconduct accounts for the m…Why and how do journals retract articles? An analysis of Medline retractions 1988–2008 (2011)Why and how do journals retra…Honorary and ghost authorship in high impact biomedical journals: a cross sectional survey (2011)Honorary and ghost authorship…Repairing research integrity (2008)Repairing research integrityWhen authorship fails. A proposal to make contributors accountable (1997)When authorship fails. A prop…When Authorship Fails (1997)When Authorship FailsTheories of Justice (1989)Theories of JusticeJustice as Fairness (1958)Justice as FairnessCitation network analysis of retractions in molecular biology field (2024)Citation network analysis of …Cheating in Academic Institutions: A Decade of Research (2001)Scientists behaving badly (2005)Retractions in the scientific literature: do authors deliberately commit research fraud? (2010)Misinformation about COVID-19: evidence for differential latent profiles and a strong association with trust in science (2021)Little Science, Big Science (1963)Hyperauthorship: A postmodern perversion or evidence of a structural shift in scholarly communication practices? (2001)How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data (2009)Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling (2012)The Prevalence of Inappropriate Image Duplication in Biomedical Research Publications (2016)Exploratory Research (2020)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank (2013)Academic Research in the 21st Century: Maintaining Scientific Integrity in a Climate of Perverse Incentives and Hypercompetition (2016)International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. (1990)Prevalence of Articles With Honorary Authors and Ghost Authors in Peer-Reviewed Medical Journals (1998)Over-optimization of academic publishing metrics: observing Goodhart's Law in action (2019)Qualitative Research Methods (2021)How can we ensure visibility and diversity in research contributions? How the Contributor Role Taxonomy (CRediT) is helping the shift from authorship to contributorship (2019)The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity (2020)Beyond Distribution and Proximity: Exploring the Multiple Spatialities of Environmental Justice (2009)Evolution of the Social Contract (2014)Energy decisions reframed as justice and ethical concerns (2016)Equality of Opportunity (1998)Distributive justice and equity in transportation (2016)Preferred reporting items for overviews of systematic reviews including harms checklist: a pilot tool to be used for balanced reporting of benefits and harms (2017)Replication across space and time must be weak in the social and environmental sciences (2021)Why do Some Countries Publish More Than Others? An International Comparison of Research Funding, English Proficiency and Publication Output in Highly Ranked General Medical Journals (2004)A Systematic Review of Research on the Meaning, Ethics and Practices of Authorship across Scholarly Disciplines (2011)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1958Justice as Fairness5,760 cited
  • 2012Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications1,231 cited
  • 1989Theories of Justice1,095 cited
  • 2015Beyond authorship: attribution, contribution, collaboration, and credit650 cited
  • 1997When authorship fails. A proposal to make contributors accountable566 cited
  • 2011Honorary and ghost authorship in high impact biomedical journals: a cross sectional survey477 cited
  • 2013Why Has the Number of Scientific Retractions Increased?415 cited
  • 1997When Authorship Fails401 cited
  • 2018Transparency in authors’ contributions and responsibilities to promote integrity in scientific publication390 cited
  • 2008Repairing research integrity300 cited
  • 2013Why Growing Retractions Are (Mostly) a Good Sign272 cited
  • 2011Why and how do journals retract articles? An analysis of Medline retractions 1988–2008263 cited
  • 2022Responsible Conduct of Research223 cited
  • 2016Why articles are retracted: a retrospective cross-sectional study of retraction notices at BioMed Central212 cited
  • 2020European Science Editing148 cited
  • 2017

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

FOSTERING INTEGRITY IN RESEARCH
135 cited

Cited by

  • 2024Citation network analysis of retractions in molecular biology field8 cited