Lexical ambiguity detection in professional discourse

Abstract

Professional discourse is the language used by specialists, such as lawyers, doctors and academics, to communicate the knowledge and assumptions associated with their respective fields. Professional discourse can be especially difficult for non-specialists to understand due to the lexical ambiguity of commonplace words that have a different or more specific meaning within a specialist domain. This phenomena also makes it harder for specialists to communicate with the general public because they are similarly unaware of the potential for misunderstandings. In this article, we present an approach for detecting domain terms with lexical ambiguity versus everyday English. We demonstrate the efficacy of our approach with three case studies in statistics, law and biomedicine. In all case studies, we identify domain terms with a [email protected] greater than 0.9, outperforming the best performing baseline by 18.1–91.7%. Most importantly, we show this ranking is broadly consistent with semantic differences. Our results highlight the difficulties that existing semantic difference methods have in the cross-domain setting, which rank non-domain terms highly due to noise or biases in the data. We additionally show that our approach generalizes to short phrases and investigate its data efficiency by varying the number of labeled examples.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 18 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.