Message framing and COVID-19 vaccine acceptance among millennials in South India

Aslesha Prakash · Robert Jeyakumar Nathan · Sannidhi Kini · Vijay Victor

31 citations0/0 files storedPLoS ONE

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy Behavioral Health and Interventions Media Influence and Health

Abstract

Vaccine hesitancy and refusal remain a major concern for healthcare professionals and policymakers. Hence, it is necessary to ascertain the underlying factors that promote or hinder the uptake of vaccines. Authorities and policy makers are experimenting with vaccine promotion messages to communities using loss and gain-framed messages. However, the effectiveness of message framing in influencing the intention to be vaccinated is unclear. Based on the Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB), this study analysed the impact of individual attitude towards COVID-19 vaccination, direct and indirect social norms, perceived behavioural control and perceived threat towards South Indian millennials' intention to get vaccinated. The study also assessed the effect of framing vaccine communication messages with gain and loss framing. Data was collected from 228 Millennials from South India during the COVID-19 pandemic from September to October 2021 and analysed using PLS path modelling and Necessary Condition Analysis (NCA). The findings reveal that attitudes towards vaccination, perceived threat and indirect social norms positively impact millennials' intention to take up vaccines in both message frames. Further, independent sample t-test between the framing groups indicate that negative (loss framed message) leads to higher vaccination intention compared to positive (gain framed message). A loss-framed message is thus recommended for message framing to promote vaccine uptake among millennials. These findings provide useful information in understanding the impact of message framing on behavioural intentions, especially in the context of vaccine uptake intentions of Millennials in South India.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 31 citations exist upstream.

References

1991The theory of planned behavior 1979Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk 1975Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research 2018When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM 2011PLS-SEM: Indeed a Silver Bullet 2015A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM)1998Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification.1998All Frames Are Not Created Equal: A Typology and Critical Analysis of Framing Effects

Cited by

2024Message Effectiveness of Fear Appeals in Vaccination Communication Campaigns: A Systematic Review

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.