Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Statistical robustness of randomized controlled trials in high-impact journals has improved but was low across medical specialties

4 references·2 citing·26 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement84,364 cited
2005Why Most Published Research Findings Are False10,571 cited
2019The statistical significance of meta-analyses is frequently fragile: definition of a fragility index for meta-analyses123 cited
2020The weakness of fragility index exposed in an analysis of the traumatic brain injury management guidelines: A meta-epidemiological and simulation study31 cited

Cited by

2023Randomized Controlled Trials in ICU in the Four Highest-Impact General Medicine Journals7 cited
2023An analysis of randomized controlled trials on anal fistula conducted between 2000 and 2020 based on the Fragility Index and Reverse Fragility Index6 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work