SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Insufficient reporting of experimental variables as a cause for nonreproducibility in animal physiology? A case study
15 references·0 citing·49 second hop
Insufficient reporting of experimental variables as a cause for nonreproducibility in animal physiology? A case study (2022)Insufficient reporting of experimental va…Reproducibility: expect less of the scientific paper (2021)Reproducibility: expect less …Dishonesty and research misconduct within the medical profession (2020)Dishonesty and research misco…A review of the current concerns about misconduct in medical sciences publications and the consequences (2020)A review of the current conce…Factors associated with scientific misconduct and questionable research practices in health professions education (2019)Factors associated with scien…Revised guidelines to enhance the rigor and reproducibility of research published in American Physiological Society journals (2018)Revised guidelines to enhance…Misconduct as the main cause for retraction. A descriptive study of retracted publications and their authors (2018)Misconduct as the main cause …Day of the week submission effect for accepted papers in Physica A, PLOS ONE, Nature and Cell (2018)Day of the week submission ef…An analysis of retractions of dental publications (2018)An analysis of retractions of…The evolutionary implications of epigenetic inheritance (2017)The evolutionary implications…Retraction of Neurosurgical Publications: A Systematic Review (2017)Retraction of Neurosurgical P…A systematic review of retracted publications in emergency medicine (2017)A systematic review of retrac…Interventions to prevent misconduct and promote integrity in research and publication (2016)Interventions to prevent misc…Day of the week effect in paper submission/acceptance/rejection to/in/by peer review journals (2016)Day of the week effect in pap…1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility (2016)1,500 scientists lift the lid…The journal impact factor: how to interpret its true value and importance. (2009)The journal impact factor: ho…Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Efficacy of the Theory of Planned Behaviour: A meta‐analytic review (2001)Recommendations for examining and interpreting funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials (2011)A Decade of Empirical Research on Research Integrity: What Have We (Not) Looked At? (2019)What Research Institutions Can Do to Foster Research Integrity (2020)Effective Strategies for Research Integrity Training—a Meta-analysis (2021)Retracted Science and the Retraction Index (2011)Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications (2012)Why Has the Number of Scientific Retractions Increased? (2013)Retracted articles in surgery journals. What are surgeons doing wrong? (2018)Post retraction citations among manuscripts reporting a radiology-imaging diagnostic method (2019)The Growth of Biological Thought: Diversity, Evolution, and Inheritance (1982)The growth of biological thought. Diversity, evolution, and inheritance (1983)The extended evolutionary synthesis: its structure, assumptions and predictions (2015)Why evolutionary biology needs anthropology: Evaluating core assumptions of the extended evolutionary synthesis (2018)Does the extended evolutionary synthesis entail extended explanatory power? (2020)Inheritance Systems and the Extended Synthesis (2020)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)The continued citation of retracted publications in dentistry (2020)Retracted publications in pharmacy systematic reviews (2022)Scientists behaving badly (2005)How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data (2009)Integrity of Authorship and Peer Review Practices: Challenges and Opportunities for Improvement (2018)The limitations of retraction notices and the heroic acts of authors who correct the scholarly record: An analysis of retractions of papers published from 1975 to 2019 (2019)Retractions, Fake Peer Reviews, and Paper Mills (2021)Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling (2012)Promoting an open research culture (2015)Explanations of Research Misconduct, and How They Hang Together (2021)Research Misconduct in the Fields of Ethics and Philosophy: Researchers’ Perceptions in Spain (2021)Factors influencing the promotion and implementation of research integrity in research performing and research funding organizations: A scoping review (2022)Publish or perish: Where are we heading? (2014)Academic Research in the 21st Century: Maintaining Scientific Integrity in a Climate of Perverse Incentives and Hypercompetition (2016)Predatory journals: no definition, no defence (2019)Retracted articles in the obstetrics literature: lessons from the past to change the future (2020)Retracted articles in the biomedical literature from Indian authors (2021)Trustworthiness assessment as an inclusion criterion for systematic reviews—What is the impact on results? (2023)Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank (2013)An open investigation of the reproducibility of cancer biology research (2014)Evaluating the replicability of social science experiments in Nature and Science between 2010 and 2015 (2018)What have we learned? (2021)Finding the right power balance: Better study design and collaboration can reduce dependence on statistical power (2024)Estimating the replicability of Brazilian biomedical science (2025)Research Misconduct Policies of Social Science Journals and Impact Factor (2010)Development and validation of reporting guidelines for studies involving data linkage (2011)Influence ratio: An alternate means to assess the relative influence of hospitality and tourism journals on research (2011)A manifesto for reproducible science (2017)Bioconda: sustainable and comprehensive software distribution for the life sciences (2018)The nf-core framework for community-curated bioinformatics pipelines (2020)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 20161,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility4,200 cited
  • 2017The evolutionary implications of epigenetic inheritance166 cited
  • 2016Interventions to prevent misconduct and promote integrity in research and publication154 cited
  • 2018Misconduct as the main cause for retraction. A descriptive study of retracted publications and their authors140 cited
  • 2019Factors associated with scientific misconduct and questionable research practices in health professions education64 cited
  • 2020A review of the current concerns about misconduct in medical sciences publications and the consequences57 cited
  • 2009The journal impact factor: how to interpret its true value and importance.54 cited
  • 2017Retraction of Neurosurgical Publications: A Systematic Review54 cited
  • 2021Reproducibility: expect less of the scientific paper47 cited
  • 2017A systematic review of retracted publications in emergency medicine47 cited
  • 2018An analysis of retractions of dental publications46 cited
  • 2018Revised guidelines to enhance the rigor and reproducibility of research published in American Physiological Society journals24 cited
  • 2016Day of the week effect in paper submission/acceptance/rejection to/in/by peer review journals22 cited
  • 2020Dishonesty and research misconduct within the medical profession

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

19 cited
  • 2018Day of the week submission effect for accepted papers in Physica A, PLOS ONE, Nature and Cell14 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.