SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Evolution of the thematic structure and main producers of physical therapy interventions research: A bibliometric analysis (1986 to 2017)
16 references·0 citing·44 second hop
Evolution of the thematic structure and main producers of physical therapy interventions research: A bibliometric analysis (1986 to 2017) (2022)Evolution of the thematic structure and m…Large-scale comparison of bibliographic data sources: Scopus, Web of Science, Dimensions, Crossref, and Microsoft Academic (2021)Large-scale comparison of bib…Measuring Science: Basic Principles and Application of Advanced Bibliometrics (2019)Measuring Science: Basic Prin…Same data—different results? Towards a comparative approach to the identification of thematic structures in science (2017)Same data—different results? …The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis (2015)The journal coverage of Web o…Visualizing Bibliometric Networks (2014)Visualizing Bibliometric Netw…Measuring Scholarly Impact (2014)Measuring Scholarly ImpactThe Leiden ranking 2011/2012: Data collection, indicators, and interpretation (2012)The Leiden ranking 2011/2012:…The cognitive structure of Library and Information Science: Analysis of article title words (2011)The cognitive structure of Li…Text mining and visualization using VOSviewer (2011)Text mining and visualization…Science mapping software tools: Review, analysis, and cooperative study among tools (2011)Science mapping software tool…Top-Cited Articles in Rehabilitation (2010)Top-Cited Articles in Rehabil…Science overlay maps: A new tool for research policy and library management (2010)Science overlay maps: A new t…CENTRAL, PEDro, PubMed, and EMBASE Are the Most Comprehensive Databases Indexing Randomized Controlled Trials of Physical Therapy Interventions (2010)CENTRAL, PEDro, PubMed, and E…Combining mapping and citation network analysis for a better understanding of the scientific development: The case of the absorptive capacity field (2008)Combining mapping and citatio…Delineating complex scientific fields by an hybrid lexical-citation method: An application to nanosciences (2006)Delineating complex scientifi…Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research: The Use of Publication and Patent Statistics in Studies of S&T Systems (2004)Handbook of Quantitative Scie…Co‐citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents (1973)Sorting Things Out (1999)The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations (2000)Indicators of the interdisciplinarity of journals: Diversity, centrality, and citations (2010)Which Type of Citation Analysis Generates the Most Accurate Taxonomy of Scientific and Technical Knowledge? (2016)Emerging trends and new developments in information science: a document co-citation analysis (2009–2016) (2018)CiteSpace II: Detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature (2005)Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping (2009)A review of the literature on citation impact indicators (2016)Constructing bibliometric networks: A comparison between full and fractional counting (2016)Citation-based clustering of publications using CitNetExplorer and VOSviewer (2017)A unified approach to mapping and clustering of bibliometric networks (2010)Advances in Social Media Research: Past, Present and Future (2017)Supply chain disruption during the COVID-19 pandemic: Recognizing potential disruption management strategies (2022)A method for analyzing text using VOSviewer (2023)The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences. (1971)Content Analysis: An Introduction to its Methodology. (1984)Basic Content Analysis (1990)A bibliometric chronicling of library and information science's first hundred years (2012)Tracing the size, reach, impact, and breadth of positive psychology (2013)Academic Influence Aware and Multidimensional Network Analysis for Research Collaboration Navigation Based on Scholarly Big Data (2018)Fuzzy sets (1965)Fuzzy sets (1996)Emerging trends in regenerative medicine: a scientometric analysis inCiteSpace (2012)Software tools for conducting bibliometric analysis in science: An up-to-date review (2020)Language biases in the coverage of the Science Citation Index and its consequencesfor international comparisons of national research performance (2001)Fatal attraction: Conceptual and methodological problems in the ranking of universities by bibliometric methods (2005)The Academic Ranking of World Universities (2005)How do you define and measure research productivity? (2014)Field-normalized citation impact indicators and the choice of an appropriate counting method (2015)Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics (1969)Bibliometrics of social media research: A co-citation and co-word analysis (2017)Examining the usage, citation, and diffusion patterns of bibliometric mapping software: A comparative study of three tools (2018)A Bibliometric Review of Research on Higher Education for Sustainable Development, 1998–2018 (2019)Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics (2015)A user-friendly method to merge Scopus and Web of Science data during bibliometric analysis (2021)Growth rates of modern science: a latent piecewise growth curve approach to model publication numbers from established and new literature databases (2021)The journal coverage of Web of Science, Scopus and Dimensions: A comparative analysis (2021)Citationchaser: A tool for transparent and efficient forward and backward citation chasing in systematic searching (2022)Scientific collaboration and endorsement: Network analysis of coauthorship and citation networks (2010)Does Interdisciplinary Research Lead to Higher Citation Impact? The Different Effect of Proximal and Distal Interdisciplinarity (2015)Springer Handbook of Science and Technology Indicators (2019)Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: A systematic comparison of citations in 252 subject categories (2018)Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World (2021)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2015The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis5,251 cited
  • 2014Visualizing Bibliometric Networks3,356 cited
  • 2011Science mapping software tools: Review, analysis, and cooperative study among tools3,274 cited
  • 2021Large-scale comparison of bibliographic data sources: Scopus, Web of Science, Dimensions, Crossref, and Microsoft Academic864 cited
  • 2011Text mining and visualization using VOSviewer729 cited
  • 2014Measuring Scholarly Impact680 cited
  • 2012The Leiden ranking 2011/2012: Data collection, indicators, and interpretation444 cited
  • 2004Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research: The Use of Publication and Patent Statistics in Studies of S&T Systems438 cited
  • 2010Science overlay maps: A new tool for research policy and library management431 cited
  • 2011The cognitive structure of Library and Information Science: Analysis of article title words187 cited
  • 2019Measuring Science: Basic Principles and Application of Advanced Bibliometrics162 cited
  • 2006Delineating complex scientific fields by an hybrid lexical-citation method: An application to nanosciences141 cited
  • 2008Combining mapping and citation network analysis for a better understanding of the scientific development: The case of the absorptive capacity field131 cited
  • 2010Top-Cited Articles in Rehabilitation

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

129 cited
  • 2010CENTRAL, PEDro, PubMed, and EMBASE Are the Most Comprehensive Databases Indexing Randomized Controlled Trials of Physical Therapy Interventions108 cited
  • 2017Same data—different results? Towards a comparative approach to the identification of thematic structures in science99 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.