SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Foreign experience in evaluating the efficiency of scientific and pedagogical research
16 references·0 citing·47 second hopsampled
Foreign experience in evaluating the efficiency of scientific and pedagogical research (2021)Foreign experience in evaluating the effi…The journal coverage of Web of Science, Scopus and Dimensions: A comparative analysis (2021)The journal coverage of Web o…Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus, Dimensions, Web of Science, and OpenCitations’ COCI: a multidisciplinary comparison of coverage via citations (2020)Google Scholar, Microsoft Aca…An extensive analysis of the presence of altmetric data for Web of Science publications across subject fields and research topics (2020)An extensive analysis of the …Do altmetrics work for assessing research quality? (2019)Do altmetrics work for assess…Gütekriterien qualitativer Sozialforschung. Ein Diskussionsanstoß (2018)Gütekriterien qualitativer So…Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: A systematic comparison of citations in 252 subject categories (2018)Google Scholar, Web of Scienc…Bubble effect: including internet search engines in systematic reviews introduces selection bias and impedes scientific reproducibility (2018)Bubble effect: including inte…Availability of digital object identifiers (DOIs) in Web of Science and Scopus (2016)Availability of digital objec…The Use of Altmetrics as a Tool for Measuring Research Impact (2015)The Use of Altmetrics as a To…Quality assessment of qualitative evidence for systematic review and synthesis: Is it meaningful, and if so, how should it be performed? (2014)Quality assessment of qualita…PICO, PICOS and SPIDER: a comparison study of specificity and sensitivity in three search tools for qualitative systematic reviews (2014)PICO, PICOS and SPIDER: a com…Do “altmetrics” correlate with citations? Extensive comparison of altmetric indicators with citations from a multidisciplinary perspective (2014)Do “altmetrics” correlate wit…Qualitative Quality: Eight “Big-Tent” Criteria for Excellent Qualitative Research (2010)Qualitative Quality: Eight “B…The issue of quality in qualitative research (2007)The issue of quality in quali…Finding qualitative research: an evaluation of search strategies (2004)Finding qualitative research:…The Challenges of Searching for and Retrieving Qualitative Studies (2003)The Challenges of Searching f…Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.0.1. The Cochrane Collaboration (2008)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care (2010)A systematic approach to searching: an efficient and complete method to develop literature searches (2018)The impact of patient, intervention, comparison, outcome (PICO) as a search strategy tool on literature search quality: a systematic review (2018)What kind of systematic review should I conduct? A proposed typology and guidance for systematic reviewers in the medical and health sciences (2018)Meta-analysis in social research (1982)Meta-Ethnography (1988)Qualitative Researching (1997)Beyond PICO (2012)Sustainability‐oriented Innovation: A Systematic Review (2015)Naturalistic inquiry (1985)Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five traditions. (1998)Seeking Qualitative Rigor in Inductive Research (2012)Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research (2014)The Discovery of Grounded Theory (2017)Thematic Analysis (2017)Qualitative research methods in health technology assessment: a review of the literature. (1998)Including qualitative research in systematic reviews: opportunities and problems (2001)Systematic reviews in the social sciences: a practical guide (2006)Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups (2007)Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews (2008)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)Improving the content validity of the mixed methods appraisal tool: a modified e-Delphi study (2019)Systematic Reviews in Educational Research: Methodology, Perspectives and Application (2019)Optimising the value of the critical appraisal skills programme (CASP) tool for quality appraisal in qualitative evidence synthesis (2020)Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)Do Altmetrics Work? Twitter and Ten Other Social Web Services (2013)Tweeting biomedicine: An analysis of tweets and citations in the biomedical literature (2013)The academic, economic and societal impacts of Open Access: an evidence-based review (2016)Scholarly use of social media and altmetrics: A review of the literature (2017)Science of science (2018)The Discovery of Grounded Theory; Strategies for Qualitative Research (1968)THE DISCOVERY OF GROUNDED THEORY: STRATEGIES FOR QUALITATIVE RESEARCH. By Barney G. Glaser and Anselm L. Strauss. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company, 1967. 271 pp. $6.75 (1968)Die (Un)Möglichkeit allgemeiner Gütekriterien in der Qualitativen Forschung – Replik auf den Diskussionsanstoß zu „Gütekriterien qualitativer Forschung“ von Jörg Strübing, Stefan Hirschauer, Ruth Ayaß, Uwe Krähnke und Thomas Scheffer (2018)Midwives Perceiving and Dealing With Violence Against Women: Is It Mostly About Midwives Actively Protecting Women? A Modified Grounded Theory Study (2020)Schulaufsicht nach dem New Public Management – Das Schulinspektorat im Kanton Bern zwischen neuer Steuerung und tradierter Aufsicht (2020)A general theory of bibliometric and other cumulative advantage processes (1976)Google Scholar, Scopus and the Web of Science: a longitudinal and cross-disciplinary comparison (2015)The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis (2015)Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World (2021)Which academic search systems are suitable for systematic reviews or meta‐analyses? Evaluating retrieval qualities of Google Scholar, PubMed, and 26 other resources (2019)Scopus as a curated, high-quality bibliometric data source for academic research in quantitative science studies (2020)Large-scale comparison of bibliographic data sources: Scopus, Web of Science, Dimensions, Crossref, and Microsoft Academic (2021)Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses (2007)Fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) in business and management research: A contemporary overview (2022)Guidelines for Bibliometric‐Systematic Literature Reviews: 10 steps to combine analysis, synthesis and theory development (2024)
this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

  • 2010Qualitative Quality: Eight “Big-Tent” Criteria for Excellent Qualitative Research9,935 cited
  • 2014PICO, PICOS and SPIDER: a comparison study of specificity and sensitivity in three search tools for qualitative systematic reviews2,840 cited
  • 2021The journal coverage of Web of Science, Scopus and Dimensions: A comparative analysis2,539 cited
  • 2018Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: A systematic comparison of citations in 252 subject categories2,343 cited
  • 2020Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus, Dimensions, Web of Science, and OpenCitations’ COCI: a multidisciplinary comparison of coverage via citations1,449 cited
  • 2014Do “altmetrics” correlate with citations? Extensive comparison of altmetric indicators with citations from a multidisciplinary perspective824 cited
  • 2004Finding qualitative research: an evaluation of search strategies317 cited
  • 2018Gütekriterien qualitativer Sozialforschung. Ein Diskussionsanstoß317 cited
  • 2003The Challenges of Searching for and Retrieving Qualitative Studies277 cited
  • 2014Quality assessment of qualitative evidence for systematic review and synthesis: Is it meaningful, and if so, how should it be performed?264 cited
  • 2007The issue of quality in qualitative research247 cited
  • 2016Availability of digital object identifiers (DOIs) in Web of Science and Scopus93 cited
  • 2020An extensive analysis of the presence of altmetric data for Web of Science publications across subject fields and research topics

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

82 cited
  • 2015The Use of Altmetrics as a Tool for Measuring Research Impact77 cited
  • 2018Bubble effect: including internet search engines in systematic reviews introduces selection bias and impedes scientific reproducibility62 cited
  • 2019Do altmetrics work for assessing research quality?61 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.