No to paid peer review

Abstract

Peer review can last months or years in some cases. Paying peer reviewers can speed up the process and motivate reviewers to evaluate manuscripts more efficiently.1 However, using money to lure reviewers in a publishing system that is already fraught with inherent and structural biases will exacerbate these shortcomings and create new challenges.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 12 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.