SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Misleading Meta-Analyses during COVID-19 Pandemic: Examples of Methodological Biases in Evidence Synthesis
9 references·0 citing·46 second hop
Misleading Meta-Analyses during COVID-19 Pandemic: Examples of Methodological Biases in Evidence Synthesis (2022)Misleading Meta-Analyses during COVID-19 …Most healthcare interventions tested in Cochrane Reviews are not effective according to high quality evidence: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2022)Most healthcare interventions…Ivermectin and the Integrity of Healthcare Evidence During COVID-19 (2022)Ivermectin and the Integrity …The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an…The lesson of ivermectin: meta-analyses based on summary data alone are inherently unreliable (2021)The lesson of ivermectin: met…Arcsine‐based transformations for meta‐analysis of proportions: Pros, cons, and alternatives (2020)Arcsine‐based transformations…A 24-step guide on how to design, conduct, and successfully publish a systematic review and meta-analysis in medical research (2019)A 24-step guide on how to des…The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta‐analyses (2016)The Mass Production of Redund…Metaprop: a Stata command to perform meta-analysis of binomial data (2014)Metaprop: a Stata command to …GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence (2011)GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating t…The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)Statistics for Experimenters (1979)Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Metan: Fixed- and Random-Effects Meta-Analysis (2008)The psychological and mental impact of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on medical staff and general public – A systematic review and meta-analysis (2020)Two new Later Stone Age sites from the Final Pleistocene in the Falémé Valley, eastern Senegal (2024)Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies (2003)GRADE guidelines 6. Rating the quality of evidence—imprecision (2011)GRADE guidelines: 4. Rating the quality of evidence—study limitations (risk of bias) (2011)GRADE guidelines: 7. Rating the quality of evidence—inconsistency (2011)A GRADE Working Group approach for rating the quality of treatment effect estimates from network meta-analysis (2014)PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation (2015)Meta-analysis and the science of research synthesis (2018)Time to challenge the spurious hierarchy of systematic over narrative reviews? (2018)SANRA—a scale for the quality assessment of narrative review articles (2019)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)How can vegetation protect us from air pollution? A critical review on green spaces' mitigation abilities for air-borne particles from a public health perspective - with implications for urban planning (2021)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta‐analyses in ecology and evolutionary biology: a PRISMA extension (2021)Appraising systematic reviews: a comprehensive guide to ensuring validity and reliability (2023)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package (2010)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2019)Global prevalence and associated risk factors of posttraumatic stress disorder during COVID-19 pandemic: A meta-analysis (2021)Conducting Meta-analyses of Proportions in R (2023)Global Prevalence of Childhood Exposure to Physical Violence within Domestic and Family Relationships in the General Population: A Systematic Review and Proportional Meta-Analysis (2023)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Global prevalence and burden of depressive and anxiety disorders in 204 countries and territories in 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic (2021)PRISMA2020 : An R package and Shiny app for producing PRISMA 2020‐compliant flow diagrams, with interactivity for optimised digital transparency and Open Synthesis (2022)Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journals (2006)Peer Review: A Flawed Process at the Heart of Science and Journals (2006)Exploring decision-makers’ challenges and strategies when selecting multiple systematic reviews: insights for AI decision support tools in healthcare (2024)The Role of Medicine: Dream, Mirage, or Nemesis? (1977)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The GRADE approach is reproducible in assessing the quality of evidence of quantitative evidence syntheses (2013)Demarcating scientific medicine (2024)Effectiveness of a multidisciplinary treatment with youth-initiated mentoring for youths with mental health needs from multi-problem families: a quasi-experimental study (2024)The evidence base of the 10 most prescribed drugs in England, France, and the United States: a scoping review (2024)Violation of research integrity principles occurs more often than we think (2021)Why and how we should join the shift from significance testing to estimation (2022)Protocol for the development of a tool (INSPECT-SR) to identify problematic randomised controlled trials in systematic reviews of health interventions (2024)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2021The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews119,202 cited
  • 2011GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence8,377 cited
  • 2014Metaprop: a Stata command to perform meta-analysis of binomial data2,136 cited
  • 2016The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta‐analyses1,499 cited
  • 2019A 24-step guide on how to design, conduct, and successfully publish a systematic review and meta-analysis in medical research682 cited
  • 2020Arcsine‐based transformations for meta‐analysis of proportions: Pros, cons, and alternatives350 cited
  • 2022Most healthcare interventions tested in Cochrane Reviews are not effective according to high quality evidence: a systematic review and meta-analysis132 cited
  • 2021The lesson of ivermectin: meta-analyses based on summary data alone are inherently unreliable88 cited
  • 2022Ivermectin and the Integrity of Healthcare Evidence During COVID-1911 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work