Articlehybrid2022

A meta-analysis on the effect of visual attention on choice.

65 citations0/0 files storedJournal of Experimental Psychology General

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies Visual Attention and Saliency Detection

Abstract

= .18. The PET-PEESE analysis suggests a small degree of publication bias which results in a slight reduction of effect sizes. A meta-regression with absolute attention difference as predictor confirms the robustness of the findings. Our findings show the relevance of assuming an effect of attention on choice, but also indicate a need for further model development to account for the complete pattern of attention effects. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 65 citations exist upstream.

Cited by

2023Visual cues during shoppers’ journeys: An exploratory paper 2025How to Conduct Valuable Marketing Research With Neurophysiological Tools 2024Unraveling information processes of decision-making with eye-tracking data 2024Visual attention and product interaction: a neuroscientific study on purchase across two product categories in a virtual store 2024Attribute latencies causally shape intertemporal decisions 2023Order in multi‐attribute product choice decisions: Evidence from discrete choice experiments combined with eye tracking 2023Attribute attention and option attention in risky choice 2024Investigations of decision processes at the intersection of psychology and economics

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.