Do independent directors and big-4 audit firms limit classification shifting: evidence from Indian firms

Abstract

Purpose This study investigates the moderating role of Big-4 audit firms on the association between board independence and classification shifting (CS) in Indian firms. Design/methodology/approach This study has employed a fixed-effect panel data regression model to analyze the sample data. Board independence is measured by taking the proportion of independent directors on a firm’s board. CS is measured from the core earnings expectation model (McVay, 2006). Principal Score Matching is applied to validate the results. Findings Based on 6,016 firm-year observations of Indian firms listed on the Bombay Stock Exchange, results show that firms with a higher proportion of independent directors on board are effective in limiting expense CS. Further, firms that Big-4 audit firms audit play a significant role in curbing expense CS. Overall, results also exhibit that Big-4 audit firms significantly influence the association between board independence and CS. Originality/value This study is one of its kind to examine the moderating role of Big-4 audit firms between board independence and CS.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 12 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.