Prefigurative legality: Transforming municipal jurisdiction

Amelia Thorpe · Bronwen Morgan

28 citations0/0 files storedUrban Studies

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Urban Planning and Governance Local Governance and Planning Political Systems and Governance

Abstract

This paper argues that prefigurative legality plays an important role in crafting municipalist strategy. We explore the experience of the City of Sydney in relation to new municipalism, focusing on its trajectory as a ‘boundary case’ that generates incrementally accrued transformative potential under conditions of muted political partisanship. The paper argues that at least in a boundary case such as this, legality can be a key and underappreciated component of transformative strategy, particularly if its prefigurative potential is appreciated. Prefigurative legality as a component of strategy is less about reconfiguring forms of state practice and more a means of institutionalising substantive policies and state practices in ways that extend the connection between community and state. As such, prefigurative legality has a deeply ambivalent relationship with the state and is both more incremental and more inclined to be ‘merely progressive’ than the prefigurative politics of radical municipalism. Nonetheless, we argue that legality still acts as an important and underappreciated pivot between power and resistance, especially where legal pluralism and multi-scalar indeterminacy are salient. The paper makes this argument while tracking the City of Sydney’s engagement with three dimensions of legality – delegated jurisdiction, legal pluralism and multi-scalar indeterminacy – and the ways in which these trajectories intersect with state and national government responses. While the Sydney case may fall just outside the boundaries of ‘classic’ instances, the role of legality in this setting generates valuable insights for the longer-term trajectories of more radical versions of new municipalism.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 28 citations exist upstream.

References

1997Excitable Speech: A Politics of the Performative 1988Legal Pluralism 1987Law: A Map of Misreading. Toward a Postmodern Conception of Law 1983The Supreme Court, 1982 Term 2013Cities within the City: Do‐It‐Yourself Urbanism and the Right to the City 1999The Common Place of Law: Stories from Everyday Life 2020What’s so new about New Municipalism?2014Escape into the City: Everyday Practices of Commoning and the Production of Urban Space in Dublin

Cited by

2022Bridging bureaucracy and activism: Challenges of activist state-work in the 1980s Greater London Council 2023Post-growth municipalism: exploring the scalar constitution, strategic relevance, and legal viability of the municipal scale for tackling growth dependencies 2024PREFIGURING PRAGMATICALLY ? Prefigurative Politics and the Constellation of People Power Strategies for Winning Affordable Housing in Cape Town 2024The spectre of growth in urban transformations: Insights from two Doughnut-oriented municipalities on the negotiation of local development pathways 2025Beyond the New Municipalism: Towards Post‐Capitalist Territorial Sovereignty in the Case of Hernani Burujabe

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.