No open-access location is known for this record yet.
No open-access location is known for this record yet.
In recent years, there have been many criticisms in the Autism field, including very low transparency (Bottema-Beutel & Crowley, 2021), biases in research and education, epistemic injustice (Botha, 2021; Milton, 2014; Sandbank et al., 2020), misalignments between community priorities and research (Pellicano et al., 2014), insufficient research with underserved populations (Hoekstra, 2022), lack of diversity and inclusivity (Elsherif et al., 2022), and repetitive replication failures (Gernsbacher & Yergeau, 2019). Discussions and implementations of Open Scholarship are uncommon and lagging in the Autism world. Open Scholarship aims to improve openness, transparency, reproducibility, and replicability, reduce biases, and promote social justice, diversity, equity, and inclusion (Parsons et al., 2022). Concrete possible solutions and rooms for improvement to various problems, based on Open Scholarship, are discussed comprehensively in the contexts of interventions, experiments, meta-analyses, replications, participatory research, lived experience of Autistic researchers, Big Team Science, adversarial and reconciling collaborations, Universal Design, incorporation of Neurodiversity perspectives in education, Open Scholarship Education, and Replication Education. Through embracing and practicing Open Scholarship in various arenas with different stakeholders, quality and impact of Autism research, education, and training will likely increase substantially, hopefully bettering lives of Autistic people meaningfully in the future.
Loading…
Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.