SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Research integrity in clinical trials: innocent errors and spin versus scientific misconduct
16 references·2 citing·41 second hop
Research integrity in clinical trials: innocent errors and spin versus scientific misconduct (2022)Research integrity in clinical trials: in…Prevalence of questionable research practices, research misconduct and their potential explanatory factors: A survey among academic researchers in The Netherlands (2022)Prevalence of questionable re…The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity (2020)The Hong Kong Principles for …Research integrity: nine ways to move from talk to walk (2020)Research integrity: nine ways…Systematic review and statistical analysis of the integrity of 33 randomized controlled trials (2016)Systematic review and statist…Ranking major and minor research misbehaviors: results from a survey among participants of four World Conferences on Research Integrity (2016)Ranking major and minor resea…Impact of peer review on reports of randomised trials published in open peer review journals: retrospective before and after study (2014)Impact of peer review on repo…Why Has the Number of Scientific Retractions Increased? (2013)Why Has the Number of Scienti…Why Growing Retractions Are (Mostly) a Good Sign (2013)Why Growing Retractions Are (…The Singapore Statement on Research Integrity (2011)The Singapore Statement on Re…Reporting and Interpretation of Randomized Controlled Trials With Statistically Nonsignificant Results for Primary Outcomes (2010)Reporting and Interpretation …The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for repo…The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA Statement for Repo…Fostering integrity in research: Definitions, current knowledge, and future directions (2006)Fostering integrity in resear…Clinical trial registration: a statement from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (2004)Clinical trial registration: …Clinical Trial Registration (2004)Clinical Trial RegistrationThe Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)The Revised CONSORT Statement…A cross-sectional study assessing visual abstracts of randomized trials revealed inadequate reporting and high prevalence of spin (2024)A cross-sectional study asses…Assessing the Integrity of Clinical Trials Included in Evidence Syntheses (2023)Assessing the Integrity of Cl…Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Empirical Evidence for Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized Trials (2004)Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias (2008)Does Cultural Competency Training of Health Professionals Improve Patient Outcomes? A Systematic Review and Proposed Algorithm for Future Research (2010)Retractions in the scientific literature: is the incidence of research fraud increasing? (2010)Evolution of Reporting P Values in the Biomedical Literature, 1990-2015 (2016)How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data (2009)Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling (2012)Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications (2012)The Prevalence of Inappropriate Image Duplication in Biomedical Research Publications (2016)Exploratory Research (2020)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use (1989)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)Impact of covert duplicate publication on meta-analysis: a case study (1997)Oxford English dictionary (2004)Scientists behaving badly (2005)A Systematic Review of Research on the Meaning, Ethics and Practices of Authorship across Scholarly Disciplines (2011)Developing a framework for responsible innovation (2013)Mitigation Pathways Compatible with Long-term Goals (2023)Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics (2015)A manifesto for reproducible science (2017)The preregistration revolution (2018)Methodology over metrics: current scientific standards are a disservice to patients and society (2021)A typology of validity: content, face, convergent, discriminant, nomological and predictive validity (2024)Principles for international registration of protocol information and results from human trials of health related interventions: Ottawa statement (part 1) (2005)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (Chinese version) (2010)Comparison of protocols and registry entries to published reports for randomised controlled trials (2011)Patient-Important Outcomes in Registered Diabetes Trials (2008)Transparent and accurate reporting increases reliability, utility, and impact of your research: reporting guidelines and the EQUATOR Network (2010)Assessing risk of bias due to missing results in a synthesis (2019)Interventions to prevent misconduct and promote integrity in research and publication (2016)Expert Trespassing Testimony and the Ethics of Science Communication (2018)Responsible Conduct of Research (2022)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2009The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration17,627 cited
  • 2009The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration10,345 cited
  • 2001The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration3,828 cited
  • 2010Reporting and Interpretation of Randomized Controlled Trials With Statistically Nonsignificant Results for Primary Outcomes828 cited
  • 2004Clinical Trial Registration579 cited
  • 2020The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity545 cited
  • 2013Why Has the Number of Scientific Retractions Increased?415 cited
  • 2004Clinical trial registration: a statement from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors408 cited
  • 2006Fostering integrity in research: Definitions, current knowledge, and future directions407 cited
  • 2011The Singapore Statement on Research Integrity316 cited
  • 2022Prevalence of questionable research practices, research misconduct and their potential explanatory factors: A survey among academic researchers in The Netherlands292 cited
  • 2013Why Growing Retractions Are (Mostly) a Good Sign272 cited
  • 2016Ranking major and minor research misbehaviors: results from a survey among participants of four World Conferences on Research Integrity

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

211 cited
  • 2020Research integrity: nine ways to move from talk to walk167 cited
  • 2016Systematic review and statistical analysis of the integrity of 33 randomized controlled trials108 cited
  • 2014Impact of peer review on reports of randomised trials published in open peer review journals: retrospective before and after study103 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2023Assessing the Integrity of Clinical Trials Included in Evidence Syntheses23 cited
    • 2024A cross-sectional study assessing visual abstracts of randomized trials revealed inadequate reporting and high prevalence of spin8 cited