SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Crowdfunding for health research: a qualitative evidence synthesis and a pilot programme
16 references·0 citing·48 second hop
Crowdfunding for health research: a qualitative evidence synthesis and a pilot programme (2022)Crowdfunding for health research: a quali…The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an…Decolonising global health in 2021: a roadmap to move from rhetoric to reform (2021)Decolonising global health in…Crowdfunding and social capital: A systematic review using a dynamic perspective (2020)Crowdfunding and social capit…The foreign gaze: authorship in academic global health (2019)The foreign gaze: authorship …Stuck in the middle: a systematic review of authorship in collaborative health research in Africa, 2014–2016 (2019)Stuck in the middle: a system…Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach (2018)Systematic review or scoping …Methods to systematically review and meta-analyse observational studies: a systematic scoping review of recommendations (2018)Methods to systematically rev…Inequalities in global health inequalities research: A 50-year bibliometric analysis (1966-2015) (2018)Inequalities in global health…Applying GRADE-CERQual to qualitative evidence synthesis findings—paper 5: how to assess adequacy of data (2018)Applying GRADE-CERQual to qua…Applying GRADE-CERQual to qualitative evidence synthesis findings—paper 4: how to assess coherence (2018)Applying GRADE-CERQual to qua…Applying GRADE-CERQual to qualitative evidence synthesis findings—paper 3: how to assess methodological limitations (2018)Applying GRADE-CERQual to qua…Applying GRADE-CERQual to qualitative evidence synthesis findings—paper 2: how to make an overall CERQual assessment of confidence and create a Summary of Qualitative Findings table (2018)Applying GRADE-CERQual to qua…Applying GRADE-CERQual to qualitative evidence synthesis findings–paper 6: how to assess relevance of the data (2018)Applying GRADE-CERQual to qua…Crowdfunding our health: Economic risks and benefits (2017)Crowdfunding our health: Econ…Using Qualitative Evidence in Decision Making for Health and Social Interventions: An Approach to Assess Confidence in Findings from Qualitative Evidence Syntheses (GRADE-CERQual) (2015)Using Qualitative Evidence in…Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews (2008)Methods for the thematic synt…How Many Interviews Are Enough? (2005)Systematic reviews in the social sciences: a practical guide (2006)Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups (2007)Rating the certainty in evidence in the absence of a single estimate of effect (2017)Improving the content validity of the mixed methods appraisal tool: a modified e-Delphi study (2019)Purposive sampling in a qualitative evidence synthesis: a worked example from a synthesis on parental perceptions of vaccination communication (2019)The Handbook of Research Synthesis. (1995)Using thematic analysis in psychology (2006)Factors influencing acceptance of technology for aging in place: A systematic review (2014)The role of masculinity in men's help-seeking for depression: A systematic review (2016)Intercoder Reliability in Qualitative Research: Debates and Practical Guidelines (2020)Handbook of qualitative research (1999)GRADE guidelines: 4. Rating the quality of evidence—study limitations (risk of bias) (2011)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence (2011)Clarifying differences between review designs and methods (2012)Applying GRADE-CERQual to qualitative evidence synthesis findings: introduction to the series (2018)Migrant women’s experiences of pregnancy, childbirth and maternity care in European countries: A systematic review (2020)Meta-ethnography in healthcare research: a guide to using a meta-ethnographic approach for literature synthesis (2021)Qualitative Evidence Synthesis: Where Are We at? (2021)Qualitative methods for health research (2009)Sample Size in Qualitative Interview Studies (2015)Health practitioners' readiness to address domestic violence and abuse: A qualitative meta-synthesis (2020)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions (2016)Challenges in meta-analyses with observational studies (2020)Quantitative Research: A Successful Investigation in Natural and Social Sciences (2020)A meta‐analysis of problem gambling risk factors in the general adult population (2021)Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework (2005)PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews (2020)Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews (2021)Recommendations for the extraction, analysis, and presentation of results in scoping reviews (2022)The Importance of Social Intervention in Britain's Mortality Decline c.1850–1914: a Re-interpretation of the Role of Public Health (1988)‘Predatory’ open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics (2015)COVID-19 mental health impact and responses in low-income and middle-income countries: reimagining global mental health (2021)Decoloniality and anti-oppressive practices for a more ethical ecology (2021)Epistemic injustice in academic global health (2021)8 Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples (2024)Scrambling for Africa: AIDS, expertise, and the rise of American global health science (2014)Decolonising global health: if not now, when? (2020)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Global prevalence and burden of depressive and anxiety disorders in 204 countries and territories in 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic (2021)PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2021)PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA Statement for Reporting Literature Searches in Systematic Reviews (2021)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2021The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews107,380 cited
  • 2018Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach11,351 cited
  • 2008Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews9,266 cited
  • 2015Using Qualitative Evidence in Decision Making for Health and Social Interventions: An Approach to Assess Confidence in Findings from Qualitative Evidence Syntheses (GRADE-CERQual)864 cited
  • 2018Applying GRADE-CERQual to qualitative evidence synthesis findings—paper 2: how to make an overall CERQual assessment of confidence and create a Summary of Qualitative Findings table568 cited
  • 2019The foreign gaze: authorship in academic global health445 cited
  • 2018Methods to systematically review and meta-analyse observational studies: a systematic scoping review of recommendations400 cited
  • 2018Applying GRADE-CERQual to qualitative evidence synthesis findings—paper 3: how to assess methodological limitations303 cited
  • 2019Stuck in the middle: a systematic review of authorship in collaborative health research in Africa, 2014–2016292 cited
  • 2018Applying GRADE-CERQual to qualitative evidence synthesis findings—paper 5: how to assess adequacy of data279 cited
  • 2018Applying GRADE-CERQual to qualitative evidence synthesis findings—paper 4: how to assess coherence276 cited
  • 2018Applying GRADE-CERQual to qualitative evidence synthesis findings–paper 6: how to assess relevance of the data266 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2021Decolonising global health in 2021: a roadmap to move from rhetoric to reform262 cited
  • 2018Inequalities in global health inequalities research: A 50-year bibliometric analysis (1966-2015)215 cited
  • 2020Crowdfunding and social capital: A systematic review using a dynamic perspective145 cited
  • 2017Crowdfunding our health: Economic risks and benefits138 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.