SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Finding the best fit for improving reproducibility: reflections from the QUEST Center for Responsible Research
14 references·1 citing·46 second hop
Finding the best fit for improving reproducibility: reflections from the QUEST Center for Responsible Research (2022)Finding the best fit for improving reprod…Training early career researchers to use meta-research to improve science: A participant-guided “learn by doing” approach (2021)Training early career researc…Investigating the replicability of preclinical cancer biology (2021)Investigating the replicabili…Improving research quality: the view from the UK Reproducibility Network institutional leads for research improvement (2021)Improving research quality: t…Challenges for assessing replicability in preclinical cancer biology (2021)Challenges for assessing repl…Automated screening of COVID-19 preprints: can we help authors to improve transparency and reproducibility? (2021)Automated screening of COVID-…The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity (2020)The Hong Kong Principles for …Improving the trustworthiness, usefulness, and ethics of biomedical research through an innovative and comprehensive institutional initiative (2020)Improving the trustworthiness…Let’s move beyond the rhetoric: it’s time to change how we judge research (2018)Let’s move beyond the rhetori…FOSTERING INTEGRITY IN RESEARCH (2017)FOSTERING INTEGRITY IN RESEAR…A pocket guide to electronic laboratory notebooks in the academic life sciences (2016)A pocket guide to electronic …Project management for academic research projects: balancing structure and flexibility (2015)Project management for academ…The behaviour change wheel: A new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions (2011)The behaviour change wheel: A…Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence (2009)Avoidable waste in the produc…Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Why Most Published Research F…Exploring the dimensions of responsible research systems and cultures: a scoping review (2024)Exploring the dimensions of r…Reflective and Impulsive Determinants of Social Behavior (2004)Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth and Happiness (2008)Nudge: improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness (2008)The Behavior Change Technique Taxonomy (v1) of 93 Hierarchically Clustered Techniques: Building an International Consensus for the Reporting of Behavior Change Interventions (2013)Beyond confidence: Development of a measure assessing the 5C psychological antecedents of vaccination (2018)Multidisciplinary research priorities for the COVID-19 pandemic: a call for action for mental health science (2020)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)False-Positive Psychology (2011)Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience (2013)The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations (1974)Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (2015)Academic Misconduct, Misrepresentation and Gaming: A Reassessment (2018)Signaling the trustworthiness of science (2019)What Research Institutions Can Do to Foster Research Integrity (2020)TALENT VERSUS LUCK: THE ROLE OF RANDOMNESS IN SUCCESS AND FAILURE (2018)The evaluation of scholarship in academic promotion and tenure processes: Past, present, and future (2018)A proposal for the future of scientific publishing in the life sciences (2019)Citation bias, diversity, and ethics (2022)Indicators of research quality, quantity, openness, and responsibility in institutional review, promotion, and tenure policies across seven countries (2022)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)A manifesto for reproducible science (2017)Framework for advancing rigorous research (2020)Technology management maturity assessment model in healthcare research centers (2021)Eleven strategies for making reproducible research and open science training the norm at research institutions (2023)Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics (2015)The preregistration revolution (2018)Methodology over metrics: current scientific standards are a disservice to patients and society (2021)Prevalence of questionable research practices, research misconduct and their potential explanatory factors: A survey among academic researchers in The Netherlands (2022)A typology of validity: content, face, convergent, discriminant, nomological and predictive validity (2024)COVID-19: the gendered impacts of the outbreak (2020)The Rigor and Transparency Index Quality Metric for Assessing Biological and Medical Science Methods (2020)Will the pandemic permanently alter scientific publishing? (2020)Blind spots on western blots: Assessment of common problems in western blot figures and methods reporting with recommendations to improve them (2022)Preprints (2022)Responsible Research Assessment I: Implementing DORA and CoARA for hiring and promotion in psychology (2022)The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. (1979)The case for motivated reasoning. (1990)Replication concerns in sports and exercise science: a narrative review of selected methodological issues in the field (2022)Reproducibility in Neuroimaging Analysis: Challenges and Solutions (2022)Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research (2014)CONSORT Statement for Randomized Trials of Nonpharmacologic Treatments: A 2017 Update and a CONSORT Extension for Nonpharmacologic Trial Abstracts (2017)The COMET Handbook: version 1.0 (2017)The replication crisis has led to positive structural, procedural, and community changes (2023)Reproducibility in machine‐learning‐based research: Overview, barriers, and drivers (2025)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2011The behaviour change wheel: A new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions13,651 cited
  • 2005Why Most Published Research Findings Are False10,471 cited
  • 2009Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence2,204 cited
  • 2020The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity545 cited
  • 2021Investigating the replicability of preclinical cancer biology419 cited
  • 2021Challenges for assessing replicability in preclinical cancer biology308 cited
  • 2017FOSTERING INTEGRITY IN RESEARCH135 cited
  • 2018Let’s move beyond the rhetoric: it’s time to change how we judge research69 cited
  • 2021Automated screening of COVID-19 preprints: can we help authors to improve transparency and reproducibility?57 cited
  • 2020Improving the trustworthiness, usefulness, and ethics of biomedical research through an innovative and comprehensive institutional initiative41 cited
  • 2016A pocket guide to electronic laboratory notebooks in the academic life sciences38 cited
  • 2015Project management for academic research projects: balancing structure and flexibility21 cited
  • 2021Training early career researchers to use meta-research to improve science: A participant-guided “learn by doing” approach15 cited
  • 2021Improving research quality: the view from the UK Reproducibility Network institutional leads for research improvement

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

14 cited

Cited by

  • 2024Exploring the dimensions of responsible research systems and cultures: a scoping review14 cited