SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Characteristics of Living Systematic Review for COVID-19
16 references·0 citing·41 second hop
Characteristics of Living Systematic Review for COVID-19 (2022)Characteristics of Living Systematic Revi…Tracking changes between preprint posting and journal publication during a pandemic (2022)Tracking changes between prep…The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an…The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on self-harm and suicidal behaviour: update of living systematic review (2021)The impact of the COVID-19 pa…International collaboration during the COVID-19 crisis: autumn 2020 developments (2021)International collaboration d…A living systematic review of the psychological problems in people suffering from COVID-19 (2021)A living systematic review of…The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on self-harm and suicidal behaviour: a living systematic review (2020)The impact of the COVID-19 pa…How a torrent of COVID science changed research publishing — in seven charts (2020)How a torrent of COVID scienc…Registration in the international prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO) of systematic review protocols was associated with increased review quality (2018)Registration in the internati…Living systematic reviews: 2. Combining human and machine effort (2017)Living systematic reviews: 2.…Association between prospective registration and overall reporting and methodological quality of systematic reviews: a meta-epidemiological study (2017)Association between prospecti…AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both (2017)AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisa…ROBIS: A new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed (2015)ROBIS: A new tool to assess r…Living Systematic Reviews: An Emerging Opportunity to Narrow the Evidence-Practice Gap (2014)Living Systematic Reviews: An…Registration of systematic reviews: PROSPERO (2012)Registration of systematic re…Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for…Methodology and Reports of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (1998)Methodology and Reports of Sy…Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)What contributions do languages other than English make on the results of meta-analyses? (2000)The inclusion of reports of randomised trials published in languages other than English in systematic reviews (2003)Religion/spirituality and adolescent health outcomes: a review (2006)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Meeting the review family: exploring review types and associated information retrieval requirements (2019)Systematic Reviews in Educational Research: Methodology, Perspectives and Application (2019)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)Seventy-Five Trials and Eleven Systematic Reviews a Day: How Will We Ever Keep Up? (2010)Using text mining for study identification in systematic reviews: a systematic review of current approaches (2015)Living systematic review: 1. Introduction—the why, what, when, and how (2017)Machine learning reduced workload with minimal risk of missing studies: development and evaluation of a randomized controlled trial classifier for Cochrane Reviews (2020)Artificial intelligence and the conduct of literature reviews (2021)How to conduct a meta-analysis in eight steps: a practical guide (2021)Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework (2005)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Systematic Reviews: Synthesis of Best Evidence for Clinical Decisions (1997)Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews (2007)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement (2010)Insomnia and risk of mortality from all-cause, cardiovascular disease, and cancer: Systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies (2019)The effectiveness of music therapy for patients with cancer: A systematic review and meta‐analysis (2020)Guidance to best tools and practices for systematic reviews (2023)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)Revisões da literatura científica: tipos, métodos e aplicações em enfermagem (2018)Reporting and utilization of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System® (PROMIS®) measures in orthopedic research and practice: a systematic review (2020)Scoping reviews in medical education: A scoping review (2020)Survey Fatigue During the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Analysis of Neurosurgery Survey Response Rates (2021)Mental disorders following COVID-19 and other epidemics: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2022)ChatGPT and the rise of large language models: the new AI-driven infodemic threat in public health (2023)Global prevalence and burden of depressive and anxiety disorders in 204 countries and territories in 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic (2021)PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2021)PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA Statement for Reporting Literature Searches in Systematic Reviews (2021)Summarizing systematic reviews (2015)Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies (2018)PROBAST: A Tool to Assess the Risk of Bias and Applicability of Prediction Model Studies (2018)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2021The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews107,380 cited
  • 2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement83,813 cited
  • 2017AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both10,605 cited
  • 2015ROBIS: A new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed2,266 cited
  • 2014Living Systematic Reviews: An Emerging Opportunity to Narrow the Evidence-Practice Gap595 cited
  • 1998Methodology and Reports of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses534 cited
  • 2018Registration in the international prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO) of systematic review protocols was associated with increased review quality388 cited
  • 2020How a torrent of COVID science changed research publishing — in seven charts387 cited
  • 2017Living systematic reviews: 2. Combining human and machine effort354 cited
  • 2017Association between prospective registration and overall reporting and methodological quality of systematic reviews: a meta-epidemiological study322 cited
  • 2021The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on self-harm and suicidal behaviour: update of living systematic review189 cited
  • 2020The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on self-harm and suicidal behaviour: a living systematic review178 cited
  • 2012Registration of systematic reviews: PROSPERO

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

172 cited
  • 2021International collaboration during the COVID-19 crisis: autumn 2020 developments109 cited
  • 2021A living systematic review of the psychological problems in people suffering from COVID-19104 cited
  • 2022Tracking changes between preprint posting and journal publication during a pandemic95 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.