SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Systematic reviews of convalescent plasma in COVID-19 continue to be poorly conducted and reported: a systematic review
16 references·0 citing·37 second hop
Systematic reviews of convalescent plasma in COVID-19 continue to be poorly conducted and reported: a systematic review (2022)Systematic reviews of convalescent plasma…The rapid, massive growth of COVID-19 authors in the scientific literature (2021)The rapid, massive growth of …The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an…Reporting and methodological quality of COVID-19 systematic reviews needs to be improved: an evidence mapping (2021)Reporting and methodological …PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA Statement for Reporting Literature Searches in Systematic Reviews (2021)PRISMA-S: an extension to the…COVID-19-related medical research: a meta-research and critical appraisal (2021)COVID-19-related medical rese…Waste in covid-19 research (2020)Waste in covid-19 researchRapid publications risk the integrity of science in the era of COVID-19 (2020)Rapid publications risk the i…Evidence-Based Research Series-Paper 2 : Using an Evidence-Based Research approach before a new study is conducted to ensure value (2020)Evidence-Based Research Serie…Evidence-Based Research Series-Paper 1: What Evidence-Based Research is and why is it important? (2020)Evidence-Based Research Serie…Registration in the international prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO) of systematic review protocols was associated with increased review quality (2018)Registration in the internati…Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review (2017)Evaluations of the uptake and…AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both (2017)AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisa…Implementing PRISMA-P: recommendations for prospective authors (2016)Implementing PRISMA-P: recomm…Librarian co-authors correlated with higher quality reported search strategies in general internal medicine systematic reviews (2015)Librarian co-authors correlat…Evaluation of the Endorsement of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) Statement on the Quality of Published Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (2013)Evaluation of the Endorsement…Applying centrality measures to impact analysis: A coauthorship network analysis (2009)Applying centrality measures …Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Optimal database combinations for literature searches in systematic reviews: a prospective exploratory study (2017)Which academic search systems are suitable for systematic reviews or meta‐analyses? Evaluating retrieval qualities of Google Scholar, PubMed, and 26 other resources (2019)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Does use of the CONSORT Statement impact the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials published in medical journals? A Cochrane reviewa (2012)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation (2015)Systematic reviews with published protocols compared to those without: more effort, older search (2017)Patients’ Experiences of Emergency Hospital Care Following Self-Harm: Systematic Review and Thematic Synthesis of Qualitative Research (2020)Intersectoral and multisectoral approaches to health policy: an umbrella review protocol (2022)Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework (2005)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)Revisões da literatura científica: tipos, métodos e aplicações em enfermagem (2018)PROSPERO: An International Register of Systematic Review Protocols (2019)Scoping reviews in medical education: A scoping review (2020)Power and Centrality: A Family of Measures (1987)An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)CiteSpace II: Detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature (2005)Scientific collaboration and endorsement: Network analysis of coauthorship and citation networks (2010)Co-authorship networks and research impact: A social capital perspective (2013)The science of science: From the perspective of complex systems (2017)Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence (2009)Scientific Publications During the COVID-19 Pandemic (2020)The mental health impact of the covid-19 pandemic on healthcare workers, and interventions to help them: A rapid systematic review (2020)Implicit bias in healthcare: clinical practice, research and decision making (2021)Open science saves lives: lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic (2021)PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)Global prevalence and burden of depressive and anxiety disorders in 204 countries and territories in 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic (2021)PRISMA2020 : An R package and Shiny app for producing PRISMA 2020‐compliant flow diagrams, with interactivity for optimised digital transparency and Open Synthesis (2022)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2021The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews119,202 cited
  • 2017AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both10,856 cited
  • 2021PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA Statement for Reporting Literature Searches in Systematic Reviews4,191 cited
  • 2013Evaluation of the Endorsement of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) Statement on the Quality of Published Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses918 cited
  • 2017Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review804 cited
  • 2009Applying centrality measures to impact analysis: A coauthorship network analysis419 cited
  • 2018Registration in the international prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO) of systematic review protocols was associated with increased review quality391 cited
  • 2015Librarian co-authors correlated with higher quality reported search strategies in general internal medicine systematic reviews338 cited
  • 2020Waste in covid-19 research334 cited
  • 2016Implementing PRISMA-P: recommendations for prospective authors238 cited
  • 2021COVID-19-related medical research: a meta-research and critical appraisal172 cited
  • 2020Evidence-Based Research Series-Paper 1: What Evidence-Based Research is and why is it important?154 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2021
Reporting and methodological quality of COVID-19 systematic reviews needs to be improved: an evidence mapping
115 cited
  • 2021The rapid, massive growth of COVID-19 authors in the scientific literature107 cited
  • 2020Evidence-Based Research Series-Paper 2 : Using an Evidence-Based Research approach before a new study is conducted to ensure value101 cited
  • 2020Rapid publications risk the integrity of science in the era of COVID-1993 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.