Ecological systems theory and second language research

Sin Wang Chong · Talia Isaacs · Jim McKinley

94 citations0/0 files storedLanguage Teaching

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning Second Language Acquisition and Learning Linguistics and Language Analysis

Abstract

“Context” has been increasingly featured and acknowledged in second language (L2) research because L2 teaching is recognised to be shaped by the environments in which it is situated. Numerous theoretical perspectives were introduced to L2 research that aim to capture the contextual forces at work in teaching and learning, including but not limited to Activity Theory, Complexity Theory, and Sociocultural Theory. Activity Theory holds that a learner's motives (human needs directed towards an object) are highly malleable, subject to the influence of such contextual variables as institutional rules, community, tools and artefacts available (see Leont'ev, 1978, 1981 who popularised Activity Theory from Sergei Rubenstein's founding and also Engeström's more current work in 1999). Complexity Theory, which has been widely adopted in both physical and social sciences, originates from physics (Martin et al., 2019). Complexity Theory was later introduced into L2 research by Diane Larsen-Freeman who posits that language learning is not only a process but a volatile and emerging system that is shaped by components of the system (e.g., learners, teachers, schools) engaging in constant and vibrant interactions (Larsen-Freeman, 2014). Sociocultural Theory highlights the sociocultural contexts where learning takes place (Lantolf, 2000; Vygotsky, 1978). Informed by a social constructivist view of learning, key concepts such as scaffolding (e.g., teachers’ support for learners) are put forward. In particular, Vygotsky argues that communication plays an indispensable role in language learning. Extrapolating Vygotsky's work to L2 research, Swain (2006) claims that languaging , dialogues among learners to discuss issues in L2 learning, is an important process of learning a L2.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 94 citations exist upstream.

References

1978Activity, consciousness, and personality 2013Sociocultural Theory and Second Language Learning 2010The Sociolinguistics of Globalization 1999Perspectives on Activity Theory 1982Problems of the Development of the Mind 2000Across the Scales of Time: Artifacts, Activities, and Meanings in Ecosocial Systems 2006Advanced Language Learning : The Contribution of Halliday and Vygotsky 2001The ecolinguistics reader : language, ecology, and environment

Cited by

2025Implementing active learning approach to promote motivation, reduce anxiety, and shape positive attitudes: A case study of EFL learners 2023Multilingualism and language teacher education 2023Feedback practices in journal peer-review: a systematic literature review 2026Beyond Polishing: The Compounding Dynamic of GenAI in Academic Writing 2024Mapping school‐level language policies across multilingual secondary schools in England: An ecology of English, modern languages and community languages policies

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.