SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Evaluation of the National Institutes of Health–Supported Relative Citation Ratio Among Fellowship-Trained American Orthopaedic Joint Reconstruction Surgery Faculty: A New Bibliometric Measure of Scientific Influence
16 references·0 citing·37 second hop
Evaluation of the National Institutes of Health–Supported Relative Citation Ratio Among Fellowship-Trained American Orthopaedic Joint Reconstruction Surgery Faculty: A New Bibliometric Measure of Scientific Influence (2022)Evaluation of the National Institutes of …The Relative Citation Ratio: Examining a Novel Measure of Research Productivity among Southern Academic Ophthalmologists (2021)The Relative Citation Ratio: …Trends in Leadership at Orthopedic Surgery Adult Reconstruction Fellowships (2020)Trends in Leadership at Ortho…Trends in Academic Spine Neurosurgeon Productivity as Measured by the Relative Citation Ratio (2020)Trends in Academic Spine Neur…Assessment of the NIH-supported relative citation ratio as a measure of research productivity among 1687 academic neurological surgeons (2020)Assessment of the NIH-support…The relative citation ratio: what is it and why should medical librarians care? (2018)The relative citation ratio: …Evaluation of the Relative Citation Ratio, a New National Institutes of Health–Supported Bibliometric Measure of Research Productivity, among Academic Radiation Oncologists (2018)Evaluation of the Relative Ci…The Use of the h-Index in Academic Orthopaedic Surgery (2017)The Use of the h-Index in Aca…A critical evaluation of the algorithm behind the Relative Citation Ratio (RCR) (2017)A critical evaluation of the …Relative Citation Ratio (RCR): A New Metric That Uses Citation Rates to Measure Influence at the Article Level (2016)Relative Citation Ratio (RCR)…Publication Productivity and Experience: Factors Associated with Academic Rank Among Orthopaedic Surgery Faculty in the United States (2016)Publication Productivity and …Google Scholar, Scopus and the Web of Science: a longitudinal and cross-disciplinary comparison (2015)Google Scholar, Scopus and th…Using Publication Metrics to Highlight Academic Productivity and Research Impact (2014)Using Publication Metrics to …Impact fact‐or fiction? (2013)Impact fact‐or fiction?The state of h index research (2008)The state of h index researchDoes the h index have predictive power? (2007)Does the h index have predict…Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)Why the impact factor of jour…An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor (2006)Theory and practise of the g-index (2006)The Hirsch index and related impact measures (2010)A multilevel meta-analysis of studies reporting correlations between the h index and 37 different h index variants (2011)An integrated approach for main path analysis: Development of the Hirsch index as an example (2011)Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics (1969)The Social Media Index: Measuring the Impact of Emergency Medicine and Critical Care Websites (2015)Social Media Scholarship and Alternative Metrics for Academic Promotion and Tenure (2017)Gender Disparity in Citations in High-Impact Journal Articles (2021)Citation Analysis as a Tool in Journal Evaluation (1972)Chance and Consensus in Peer Review (1981)Publishing by—and for?—the Numbers (1990)A review of the literature on citation impact indicators (2016)Which h-index? — A comparison of WoS, Scopus and Google Scholar (2007)Gender trends in authorship of spine-related academic literature—a 39-year perspective (2017)Sex Differences in Faculty Rank Among Academic Surgeons in the United States in 2014 (2018)Despite Growing Number of Women Surgeons, Authorship Gender Disparity in Orthopaedic Literature Persists Over 30 Years (2019)Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses (2007)Chairs of United States Academic Ophthalmology Departments: A Descriptive Analysis and Trends (2018)Publication Productivity and Academic Rank in Medicine: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (2020)Sex Differences in Academic Productivity Across Academic Ranks and Specialties in Academic Medicine (2021)Universality of citation distributions: Toward an objective measure of scientific impact (2008)Feasibility of common bibliometrics in evaluating translational science (2017)Altmetric and bibliometric analysis of obstetrics and gynecology research: influence of public engagement on citation potential (2022)Co‐citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents (1973)Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics (2015)Some bibliometric procedures for analyzing and evaluating research fields (2017)Assessing scientists for hiring, promotion, and tenure (2018)Topic choice contributes to the lower rate of NIH awards to African-American/black scientists (2019)What do we know about the h index? (2007)A bibliometric analysis of obstetrics and gynecology articles with highest relative citation ratios, 1980 to 2019 (2020)h-Index: A review focused in its variants, computation and standardization for different scientific fields (2009)A review of theory and practice in scientometrics (2015)Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: A systematic comparison of citations in 252 subject categories (2018)A tale of two databases: the use of Web of Science and Scopus in academic papers (2020)The journal coverage of Web of Science, Scopus and Dimensions: A comparative analysis (2021)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1997Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research2,444 cited
  • 2015Google Scholar, Scopus and the Web of Science: a longitudinal and cross-disciplinary comparison1,783 cited
  • 2007Does the h index have predictive power?973 cited
  • 2016Relative Citation Ratio (RCR): A New Metric That Uses Citation Rates to Measure Influence at the Article Level499 cited
  • 2008The state of h index research396 cited
  • 2014Using Publication Metrics to Highlight Academic Productivity and Research Impact377 cited
  • 2016Publication Productivity and Experience: Factors Associated with Academic Rank Among Orthopaedic Surgery Faculty in the United States171 cited
  • 2017The Use of the h-Index in Academic Orthopaedic Surgery156 cited
  • 2020Assessment of the NIH-supported relative citation ratio as a measure of research productivity among 1687 academic neurological surgeons54 cited
  • 2018The relative citation ratio: what is it and why should medical librarians care?46 cited
  • 2018Evaluation of the Relative Citation Ratio, a New National Institutes of Health–Supported Bibliometric Measure of Research Productivity, among Academic Radiation Oncologists43 cited
  • 2017A critical evaluation of the algorithm behind the Relative Citation Ratio (RCR)42 cited
  • 2020Trends in Leadership at Orthopedic Surgery Adult Reconstruction Fellowships40 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2013
Impact fact‐or fiction?
36 cited
  • 2020Trends in Academic Spine Neurosurgeon Productivity as Measured by the Relative Citation Ratio29 cited
  • 2021The Relative Citation Ratio: Examining a Novel Measure of Research Productivity among Southern Academic Ophthalmologists24 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.