SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Harms-related data are poorly reported among randomized controlled trials underpinning the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons clinical practice guideline recommendations for rotator cuff injuries
13 references·0 citing·51 second hopsampled
Harms-related data are poorly reported among randomized controlled trials underpinning the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons clinical practice guideline recommendations for rotator cuff injuries (2022)Harms-related data are poorly reported am…An Evaluation of Reporting Guidelines and Clinical Trial Registry Requirements Among Plastic Surgery Journals (2018)An Evaluation of Reporting Gu…An Evaluation of Reporting Guidelines and Clinical Trial Registry Requirements Among Orthopaedic Surgery Journals (2018)An Evaluation of Reporting Gu…Reporting of harm and safety results in randomized controlled trials published in 5 dermatology journals (2017)Reporting of harm and safety …How well are reporting guidelines and trial registration used by dermatology journals to limit bias? A meta-epidemiological study (2017)How well are reporting guidel…Guidelines for reporting meta-epidemiological methodology research (2017)Guidelines for reporting meta…Reporting of harms data in RCTs: a systematic review of empirical assessments against the CONSORT harms extension (2013)Reporting of harms data in RC…Effect of editors' implementation of CONSORT guidelines on the reporting of abstracts in high impact medical journals: interrupted time series analysis (2012)Effect of editors' implementa…Adherence to CONSORT harms-reporting recommendations in publications of recent analgesic clinical trials: An ACTTION systematic review (2012)Adherence to CONSORT harms-re…The quality of safety reporting in trials is still suboptimal: Survey of major general medical journals (2010)The quality of safety reporti…Reporting of Harm in Randomized Controlled Trials Published in the Urological Literature (2010)Reporting of Harm in Randomiz…Understanding randomised controlled trials (2005)Understanding randomised cont…The CONSORT statement: Revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomized trials 2001 (2005)The CONSORT statement: Revise…Balancing benefits and harms in health care (2003)Balancing benefits and harms …Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Incomplete evidence: the inadequacy of databases in tracing published adverse drug reactions in clinical trials (2001)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials (2001)Assessing harmful effects in systematic Reviews (2004)How to spot bias and other potential problems in randomised controlled trials (2004)Room for improvement? A survey of the methods used in systematic reviews of adverse effects (2006)The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)Better Reporting of Harms in Randomized Trials: An Extension of the CONSORT Statement (2004)Empirical Evidence for Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized Trials (2004)Comprehensive evaluations of the adverse effects of drugs: importance of appropriate study selection and data sources (2011)Reporting of adverse events in randomised controlled trials of antiepileptic drugs using the CONSORT criteria for reporting harms (2011)Adverse event reporting in randomised controlled trials of neuropathic pain: Considerations for future practice (2012)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)Disagreements in meta-analyses using outcomes measured on continuous or rating scales: observer agreement study (2009)Adequacy of Published Oncology Randomized Controlled Trials to Provide Therapeutic Details Needed for Clinical Application (2010)Effects of relational music therapy on communication of children with autism: a randomized controlled study (2011)Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement (1996)Adverse event assessment, analysis, and reporting in recent published analgesic clinical trials: ACTTION systematic review and recommendations (2013)Poor adherence of randomised trials in surgery to CONSORT guidelines for non-pharmacological treatments (NPT): a cross-sectional study (2013)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updated Guidelines for Reporting Parallel Group Randomized Trials (2010)Adverse event methods were heterogeneous and insufficiently reported in randomized trials on persistent depressive disorder (2015)Checklist for the preparation and review of pain clinical trial publications: a pain-specific supplement to CONSORT (2017)Use of the CONSORT Statement and Quality of Reports of Randomized Trials (2001)The impact of outcome reporting bias in randomised controlled trials on a cohort of systematic reviews (2010)Harms in Systematic Reviews Paper 1: An introduction to research on harms (2021)Validity of data extraction in evidence synthesis practice of adverse events: reproducibility study (2022)CONSORT Harms 2022 statement, explanation, and elaboration: updated guideline for the reporting of harms in randomized trials (2023)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2011)How evidence-based is an 'evidence-based parenting program'? A PRISMA systematic review and meta-analysis of Triple P (2012)The CARE Guidelines: Consensus-based Clinical Case Report Guideline Development (2013)Effectiveness of music therapy: a summary of systematic reviews based on randomized controlled trials of music interventions (2014)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Understanding systematic reviews and meta-analysis (2005)Core outcomes in neonatology: development of a core outcome set for neonatal research (2019)Psychosocial Health Interventions by Social Robots: Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials (2019)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)Evaluation of the Endorsement of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) Statement on the Quality of Published Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (2013)Rating the certainty in evidence in the absence of a single estimate of effect (2017)Agreement between the Cochrane risk of bias tool and Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale: A meta-epidemiological study of randomized controlled trials of physical therapy interventions (2019)A tutorial on methodological studies: the what, when, how and why (2020)Assessment of publication bias and outcome reporting bias in systematic reviews of health services and delivery research: A meta-epidemiological study (2020)The Hazards of Scoring the Quality of Clinical Trials for Meta-analysis (1999)Reported Methodologic Quality and Discrepancies between Large and Small Randomized Trials in Meta-Analyses (2001)An Evaluation of Publication Bias in High-Impact Orthopaedic Literature (2019)An Evaluation of Spin in Lower Extremity Joint Trials (2019)Analyzing Spin in Abstracts of Orthopaedic Randomized Controlled Trials With Statistically Insignificant Primary Endpoints (2020)
this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

  • 2017Guidelines for reporting meta-epidemiological methodology research514 cited
  • 2005Understanding randomised controlled trials458 cited
  • 2012Effect of editors' implementation of CONSORT guidelines on the reporting of abstracts in high impact medical journals: interrupted time series analysis235 cited
  • 2005The CONSORT statement: Revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomized trials 2001198 cited
  • 2013Reporting of harms data in RCTs: a systematic review of empirical assessments against the CONSORT harms extension111 cited
  • 2003Balancing benefits and harms in health care104 cited
  • 2010The quality of safety reporting in trials is still suboptimal: Survey of major general medical journals84 cited
  • 2012Adherence to CONSORT harms-reporting recommendations in publications of recent analgesic clinical trials: An ACTTION systematic review65 cited
  • 2018An Evaluation of Reporting Guidelines and Clinical Trial Registry Requirements Among Orthopaedic Surgery Journals64 cited
  • 2010Reporting of Harm in Randomized Controlled Trials Published in the Urological Literature59 cited
  • 2018An Evaluation of Reporting Guidelines and Clinical Trial Registry Requirements Among Plastic Surgery Journals32 cited
  • 2017Reporting of harm and safety results in randomized controlled trials published in 5 dermatology journals21 cited
  • 2017How well are reporting guidelines and trial registration used by dermatology journals to limit bias? A meta-epidemiological study

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

15 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.