SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Procrastination and inconsistency: Expressions of concern for publications with compromised integrity
16 references·0 citing·37 second hop
Procrastination and inconsistency: Expressions of concern for publications with compromised integrity (2022)Procrastination and inconsistency: Expres…Ethics toolkit for a successful editorial office (2022)Ethics toolkit for a successf…Timeliness and content of retraction notices for publications by a single research group (2021)Timeliness and content of ret…An extended state of uncertainty: A snap-shot of expressions of concern in neuroscience (2021)An extended state of uncertai…Reform retractions to make them more transparent (2020)Reform retractions to make th…Empirically generated reference proportions for baseline p values from rounded summary statistics (2020)Empirically generated referen…Correcting the scientific record – A broken system? (2020)Correcting the scientific rec…Check for publication integrity before misconduct (2020)Check for publication integri…We need to talk about systematic fraud (2019)We need to talk about systema…Quality of reports of investigations of research integrity by academic institutions (2019)Quality of reports of investi…Assessing and Raising Concerns About Duplicate Publication, Authorship Transgressions and Data Errors in a Body of Preclinical Research (2019)Assessing and Raising Concern…An investigation into the impact and implications of published papers from retracted research: systematic search of affected literature (2019)An investigation into the imp…Repeating probability of authors with retracted scientific publications (2018)Repeating probability of auth…Concern noted: a descriptive study of editorial expressions of concern in PubMed and PubMed Central (2017)Concern noted: a descriptive …Systematic review and statistical analysis of the integrity of 33 randomized controlled trials (2016)Systematic review and statist…Statistics and the detection of scientific misconduct (2016)Statistics and the detection …Research Misconduct, Retraction, and Cleansing the Medical Literature: Lessons from the Poehlman Case (2006)Research Misconduct, Retracti…When Authorship Fails (1997)When Authorship Fails (1997)Retracted Science and the Retraction Index (2011)A Comprehensive Survey of Retracted Articles from the Scholarly Literature (2012)Governing knowledge in the scientific community: Exploring the role of retractions in biomedicine (2012)Data Extraction Errors in Meta-analyses That Use Standardized Mean Differences (2007)The analysis of 168 randomised controlled trials to test data integrity (2012)Data integrity of 35 randomised controlled trials in women’ health (2020)Citation of retracted publications: A challenging problem (2021)Methods to assess research misconduct in health-related research: A scoping review (2021)Institutional Research Misconduct Reports Need More Credibility (2018)A typology of validity: content, face, convergent, discriminant, nomological and predictive validity (2024)Publication integrity: what is it, why does it matter, how it is safeguarded and how could we do better? (2024)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The Oligopoly of Academic Publishers in the Digital Era (2015)Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews (2016)The thin ret(raction) line: biomedical journal responses to incorrect non-targeting nucleotide sequence reagents in human gene knockdown publications (2021)When beauty is but skin deep: dealing with problematic studies in systematic reviews (2021)Reducing the residue of retractions in evidence synthesis: ways to minimise inappropriate citation and use of retracted data (2023)Measurement of Prosocial Reasoning among Chinese Adolescents (2012)Checklist to assess Trustworthiness in RAndomised Controlled Trials (TRACT checklist): concept proposal and pilot (2023)Fake publications in biomedical science: red-flagging method indicates mass production (2025)Why Has the Number of Scientific Retractions Increased? (2013)Identifying and managing problematic trials: A research integrity assessment tool for randomized controlled trials in evidence synthesis (2022)Data fabrication and other reasons for non‐random sampling in 5087 randomised, controlled trials in anaesthetic and general medical journals (2017)Assessing Research Misconduct in Randomized Controlled Trials (2021)Integrity of randomized clinical trials: Performance of integrity tests and checklists requires assessment (2023)Why articles are retracted: a retrospective cross-sectional study of retraction notices at BioMed Central (2016)False individual patient data and zombie randomised controlled trials submitted to Anaesthesia (2020)Retracted publications in pharmacy systematic reviews (2022)Identification of retracted publications and completeness of retraction notices in public health (2024)Retraction Stigma and its Communication via Retraction Notices (2022)The effectiveness of peer review in identifying issues leading to retractions (2023)How to fight fake papers: a review on important information sources and steps towards solution of the problem (2024)Alice in Suicideland: Exploring the Suicidal Ideation Mechanism through the Sense of Connectedness and Help-Seeking Behaviors (2021)Bosses without a heart: socio-demographic and cross-cultural determinants of attitude toward Emotional AI in the workplace (2021)Building eco-surplus culture among urban residents as a novel strategy to improve finance for conservation in protected areas (2022)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2020Reform retractions to make them more transparent1,075 cited
  • 2006Research Misconduct, Retraction, and Cleansing the Medical Literature: Lessons from the Poehlman Case199 cited
  • 2020Check for publication integrity before misconduct113 cited
  • 2016Systematic review and statistical analysis of the integrity of 33 randomized controlled trials108 cited
  • 2019An investigation into the impact and implications of published papers from retracted research: systematic search of affected literature57 cited
  • 2019Quality of reports of investigations of research integrity by academic institutions42 cited
  • 2021Timeliness and content of retraction notices for publications by a single research group41 cited
  • 2019We need to talk about systematic fraud39 cited
  • 2020Empirically generated reference proportions for baseline p values from rounded summary statistics37 cited
  • 2017Concern noted: a descriptive study of editorial expressions of concern in PubMed and PubMed Central34 cited
  • 2018Repeating probability of authors with retracted scientific publications27 cited
  • 2019Assessing and Raising Concerns About Duplicate Publication, Authorship Transgressions and Data Errors in a Body of Preclinical Research24 cited
  • 2020Correcting the scientific record – A broken system?21 cited
  • 2016Statistics and the detection of scientific misconduct

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

18 cited
  • 2021An extended state of uncertainty: A snap-shot of expressions of concern in neuroscience14 cited
  • 2022Ethics toolkit for a successful editorial office12 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.