SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Knowledge user survey and Delphi process to inform development of a new risk of bias tool to assess systematic reviews with network meta-analysis (RoB NMA tool)
16 references·3 citing·39 second hop
Knowledge user survey and Delphi process to inform development of a new risk of bias tool to assess systematic reviews with network meta-analysis (RoB NMA tool) (2022)Knowledge user survey and Delphi process …Quality assessment with diverse studies (QuADS): an appraisal tool for methodological and reporting quality in systematic reviews of mixed- or multi-method studies (2021)Quality assessment with diver…Delphi Technique in Health Sciences: A Map (2020)Delphi Technique in Health Sc…COSMIN Risk of Bias tool to assess the quality of studies on reliability or measurement error of outcome measurement instruments: a Delphi study (2020)COSMIN Risk of Bias tool to a…CINeMA: An approach for assessing confidence in the results of a network meta-analysis (2020)CINeMA: An approach for asses…RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2019)RoB 2: a revised tool for ass…Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2019)Cochrane Handbook for Systema…Association Between Risk-of-Bias Assessments and Results of Randomized Trials in Cochrane Reviews: The ROBES Meta-Epidemiologic Study (2017)Association Between Risk-of-B…AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both (2017)AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisa…ROBIS: A new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed (2015)ROBIS: A new tool to assess r…Evaluation of the Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing the risk of bias in randomized trials: focus groups, online survey, proposed recommendations and their implementation (2014)Evaluation of the Cochrane Co…A GRADE Working Group approach for rating the quality of treatment effect estimates from network meta-analysis (2014)A GRADE Working Group approac…Using and Reporting the Delphi Method for Selecting Healthcare Quality Indicators: A Systematic Review (2011)Using and Reporting the Delph…Guidance for Developers of Health Research Reporting Guidelines (2010)Guidance for Developers of He…Towards systematic reviews that inform health care management and policy-making (2005)Towards systematic reviews th…Improving the Quality of Web Surveys: The Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys (CHERRIES) (2004)Improving the Quality of Web …The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews (2003)The development of QUADAS: a …Updating the PRISMA reporting guideline for network meta-analysis: a scoping review (2025)Updating the PRISMA reporting…Methodological review of NMA bias concepts provides groundwork for the development of a list of concepts for potential inclusion in a new risk of bias tool for network meta-analysis (RoB NMA Tool) (2024)Methodological review of NMA …Exploring decision-makers’ challenges and strategies when selecting multiple systematic reviews: insights for AI decision support tools in healthcare (2024)Exploring decision-makers’ ch…Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) statement (2013)Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS)—Explanation and Elaboration: A Report of the ISPOR Health Economic Evaluation Publication Guidelines Good Reporting Practices Task Force (2013)Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use (1989)Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique (2000)The Delphi technique: myths and realities (2003)Delphi methodology in health research: how to do it? (2015)Delphi methodology in healthcare research: How to decide its appropriateness (2021)Use of Delphi in health sciences research: A narrative review (2023)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care (2010)The methodological quality assessment tools for preclinical and clinical studies, systematic review and meta‐analysis, and clinical practice guideline: a systematic review (2015)GRADE guidelines 6. Rating the quality of evidence—imprecision (2011)GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence (2011)GRADE guidelines: 4. Rating the quality of evidence—study limitations (risk of bias) (2011)Network meta-analysis: an introduction for clinicians (2016)GRADE guidelines: 18. How ROBINS-I and other tools to assess risk of bias in nonrandomized studies should be used to rate the certainty of a body of evidence (2018)Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework (2005)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (2011)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions (2016)The PRISMA Extension Statement for Reporting of Systematic Reviews Incorporating Network Meta-analyses of Health Care Interventions: Checklist and Explanations (2015)CINeMA: Software for semiautomated assessment of the confidence in the results of network meta‐analysis (2020)PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2020)netmeta : An R Package for Network Meta-Analysis Using Frequentist Methods (2023)A guide for the design and conduct of self-administered surveys of clinicians (2008)Knowledge and Perceptions of COVID-19 Among Health Care Workers: Cross-Sectional Study (2020)A Consensus-Based Checklist for Reporting of Survey Studies (CROSS) (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Summarizing systematic reviews (2015)Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies (2018)PROBAST: A Tool to Assess the Risk of Bias and Applicability of Prediction Model Studies (2018)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2019RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials33,067 cited
  • 2019Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions14,763 cited
  • 2017AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both10,605 cited
  • 2004Improving the Quality of Web Surveys: The Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys (CHERRIES)6,450 cited
  • 2003The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews3,593 cited
  • 2015ROBIS: A new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed2,266 cited
  • 2011Using and Reporting the Delphi Method for Selecting Healthcare Quality Indicators: A Systematic Review2,046 cited
  • 2020CINeMA: An approach for assessing confidence in the results of a network meta-analysis1,923 cited
  • 2014A GRADE Working Group approach for rating the quality of treatment effect estimates from network meta-analysis1,812 cited
  • 2010Guidance for Developers of Health Research Reporting Guidelines1,432 cited
  • 2020Delphi Technique in Health Sciences: A Map1,071 cited
  • 2005Towards systematic reviews that inform health care management and policy-making589 cited
  • 2020COSMIN Risk of Bias tool to assess the quality of studies on reliability or measurement error of outcome measurement instruments: a Delphi study

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

587 cited
  • 2021Quality assessment with diverse studies (QuADS): an appraisal tool for methodological and reporting quality in systematic reviews of mixed- or multi-method studies488 cited
  • 2017Association Between Risk-of-Bias Assessments and Results of Randomized Trials in Cochrane Reviews: The ROBES Meta-Epidemiologic Study381 cited
  • 2014Evaluation of the Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing the risk of bias in randomized trials: focus groups, online survey, proposed recommendations and their implementation340 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2024Methodological review of NMA bias concepts provides groundwork for the development of a list of concepts for potential inclusion in a new risk of bias tool for network meta-analysis (RoB NMA Tool)18 cited
    • 2025Updating the PRISMA reporting guideline for network meta-analysis: a scoping review14 cited
    • 2024Exploring decision-makers’ challenges and strategies when selecting multiple systematic reviews: insights for AI decision support tools in healthcare9 cited