SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Bibliometric Analysis of Studies on Whole Body Electromyostimulation
13 references·0 citing·33 second hop
Bibliometric Analysis of Studies on Whole Body Electromyostimulation (2022)Bibliometric Analysis of Studies on Whole…Constructing bibliometric networks: A comparison between full and fractional counting (2016)Constructing bibliometric net…The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis (2015)The journal coverage of Web o…Google Scholar, Scopus and the Web of Science: a longitudinal and cross-disciplinary comparison (2015)Google Scholar, Scopus and th…A Comparison between Two Main Academic Literature Collections: Web of Science and Scopus Databases (2013)A Comparison between Two Main…A unified approach to mapping and clustering of bibliometric networks (2010)A unified approach to mapping…Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses (2007)Comparison of PubMed, Scopus,…Three options for citation tracking: Google Scholar, Scopus and Web of Science (2006)Three options for citation tr…An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)An index to quantify an indiv…Technical Note—Exact Solution for the Bradford Distribution and Its Use in Modeling Informational Data (1979)Technical Note—Exact Solution…New options for team research via international computer networks (1979)New options for team research…Book Use as a Bradford-Zipf Phenomenon (1978)Book Use as a Bradford-Zipf P…Lotka's frequency distribution of scientific productivity (1977)Lotka's frequency distributio…A general theory of bibliometric and other cumulative advantage processes (1976)A general theory of bibliomet…Citation Indexing-Its Theory and Application in Science, Technology, and Humanities (1980)Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor (2006)Which h-index? — A comparison of WoS, Scopus and Google Scholar (2007)Comparison of SCImago journal rank indicator with journal impact factor (2008)A comparison of Scopus and Web of Science for a typical university (2009)The frequency distribution of scientific productivity (1926)An empirical examination of Lotka's Law (1986)Scientific Wealth in Middle East and North Africa: Productivity, Indigeneity, and Specialty in 1981–2013 (2016)Flipped classroom in the second decade of the Millenia: a Bibliometrics analysis with Lotka’s law (2021)Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping (2009)Science mapping software tools: Review, analysis, and cooperative study among tools (2011)Citation-based clustering of publications using CitNetExplorer and VOSviewer (2017)Little Science, Big Science (1963)Networks of Scientific Papers (1965)Power laws, Pareto distributions and Zipf's law (2005)Cumulative Advantage as a Mechanism for Inequality: A Review of Theoretical and Empirical Developments (2006)Co‐citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents (1973)Visualizing Bibliometric Networks (2014)Some bibliometric procedures for analyzing and evaluating research fields (2017)Circular economy business models: The state of research and avenues ahead (2020)Crisis leadership: A review and future research agenda (2021)Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: A systematic comparison of citations in 252 subject categories (2018)The journal coverage of Web of Science, Scopus and Dimensions: A comparative analysis (2021)Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World (2021)The Role of Google Scholar in Evidence Reviews and Its Applicability to Grey Literature Searching (2015)Which academic search systems are suitable for systematic reviews or meta‐analyses? Evaluating retrieval qualities of Google Scholar, PubMed, and 26 other resources (2019)Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics (2015)The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact? (2015)bibliometrix : An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis (2017)Google Scholar to overshadow them all? Comparing the sizes of 12 academic search engines and bibliographic databases (2018)Women are credited less in science than men (2022)A tale of two databases: the use of Web of Science and Scopus in academic papers (2020)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2005An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output11,612 cited
  • 2015The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis5,251 cited
  • 2007Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses5,030 cited
  • 2010A unified approach to mapping and clustering of bibliometric networks2,237 cited
  • 1976A general theory of bibliometric and other cumulative advantage processes2,039 cited
  • 2013A Comparison between Two Main Academic Literature Collections: Web of Science and Scopus Databases1,930 cited
  • 2015Google Scholar, Scopus and the Web of Science: a longitudinal and cross-disciplinary comparison1,783 cited
  • 2016Constructing bibliometric networks: A comparison between full and fractional counting1,409 cited
  • 2006Three options for citation tracking: Google Scholar, Scopus and Web of Science751 cited
  • 1977Lotka's frequency distribution of scientific productivity215 cited
  • 1979New options for team research via international computer networks63 cited
  • 1978Book Use as a Bradford-Zipf Phenomenon59 cited
  • 1979Technical Note—Exact Solution for the Bradford Distribution and Its Use in Modeling Informational Data52 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work