SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Uses of the Journal Impact Factor in national journal rankings in China and Europe
16 references·3 citing·45 second hop
Uses of the Journal Impact Factor in national journal rankings in China and Europe (2022)Uses of the Journal Impact Factor in nati…Multilingual publishing in the social sciences and humanities: A seven‐country European study (2020)Multilingual publishing in th…Use of the Journal Impact Factor in academic review, promotion, and tenure evaluations (2019)Use of the Journal Impact Fac…Rethinking impact factors: better ways to judge a journal (2019)Rethinking impact factors: be…The Norwegian Model in Norway (2018)The Norwegian Model in NorwayChina declared world’s largest producer of scientific articles (2018)China declared world’s larges…Science deserves to be judged by its contents, not by its wrapping: Revisiting Seglen's work on journal impact and research evaluation (2017)Science deserves to be judged…Publish or impoverish (2017)Publish or impoverishA review of the literature on citation impact indicators (2016)A review of the literature on…Impacts of performance-based research funding systems: The case of the Norwegian Publication Indicator (2015)Impacts of performance-based …Frascati Manual 2015 (2015)Frascati Manual 2015Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics (2015)Bibliometrics: The Leiden Man…Scientific Utopia (2012)Scientific UtopiaHow journal rankings can suppress interdisciplinary research: A comparison between Innovation Studies and Business & Management (2012)How journal rankings can supp…Changing Incentives to Publish (2011)Changing Incentives to PublishRanking Political Science Journals: Reputational and Citational Approaches (2007)Ranking Political Science Jou…The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor (2006)The History and Meaning of th…How metric-based performance evaluation systems fuel the growth of questionable publications? (2024)How metric-based performance …Sorting out journals: The proliferation of journal lists in China (2023)Sorting out journals: The pro…Inconsistent quality signals: evidence from the regional journals (2023)Inconsistent quality signals:…Science and Engineering Indicators 1998 (1998)Science and Engineering Indicators (2004)The mover’s advantage: The superior performance of migrant scientists (2013)Researchers’ Individual Publication Rate Has Not Increased in a Century (2016)Self-citations as strategic response to the use of metrics for career decisions (2017)Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact? (2015)Science Mapping: A Systematic Review of the Literature (2017)Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World (2021)The New production of knowledge: the dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies (1995)What is research collaboration? (1997)Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping (2009)Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank (2013)Does Interdisciplinary Research Lead to Higher Citation Impact? The Different Effect of Proximal and Distal Interdisciplinarity (2015)Evaluation practices and effects of indicator use—a literature review (2015)Citation Analysis as a Tool in Journal Evaluation (1972)Free online availability substantially increases a paper's impact (2001)A Comparison between Two Main Academic Literature Collections: Web of Science and Scopus Databases (2013)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)A power primer. (1992)Beyond Power Calculations (2014)The Extent and Consequences of P-Hacking in Science (2015)Choosing Prediction Over Explanation in Psychology: Lessons From Machine Learning (2017)Two new Later Stone Age sites from the Final Pleistocene in the Falémé Valley, eastern Senegal (2024)OECD Patent Statistics Manual (2009)OECD Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard (2009)Reducing the precarity of academic research careers (2021)The production of social science research in Nigeria: status and systemic determinants (2022)The Matthew Effect in Science (1968)China statistical yearbook (1988)The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis (2015)The role of transportation speed in facilitating high skilled teamwork across cities (2019)China's catching-up in artificial intelligence seen as a co-evolution of corporate and national innovation systems (2021)The strain on scientific publishing (2024)The Increasing Dominance of Teams in Production of Knowledge (2007)Constructing bibliometric networks: A comparison between full and fractional counting (2016)Citations, Citation Indicators, and Research Quality: An Overview of Basic Concepts and Theories (2019)Papers and patents are becoming less disruptive over time (2023)Building University-Industry Co-Innovation Networks in Transnational Innovation Ecosystems: Towards a Transdisciplinary Approach of Integrating Social Sciences and Artificial Intelligence (2019)Writing Motivation in School: a Systematic Review of Empirical Research in the Early Twenty-First Century (2020)Sofrimento psíquico entre os profissionais de enfermagem durante a pandemia da COVID-19: Scoping Review (2021)Academic criteria for promotion and tenure in biomedical sciences faculties: cross sectional analysis of international sample of universities (2020)Why we publish where we do: Faculty publishing values and their relationship to review, promotion and tenure expectations (2020)Gendered citation practices in the field of communication (2021)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2015Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics2,816 cited
  • 2006The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor2,765 cited
  • 2016A review of the literature on citation impact indicators1,344 cited
  • 2012Scientific Utopia1,301 cited
  • 2015Frascati Manual 20151,129 cited
  • 2012How journal rankings can suppress interdisciplinary research: A comparison between Innovation Studies and Business & Management581 cited
  • 2019Use of the Journal Impact Factor in academic review, promotion, and tenure evaluations357 cited
  • 2017Publish or impoverish306 cited
  • 2011Changing Incentives to Publish231 cited
  • 2018China declared world’s largest producer of scientific articles208 cited
  • 2015Impacts of performance-based research funding systems: The case of the Norwegian Publication Indicator134 cited
  • 2020Multilingual publishing in the social sciences and humanities: A seven‐country European study116 cited
  • 2007Ranking Political Science Journals: Reputational and Citational Approaches95 cited
  • 2019Rethinking impact factors: better ways to judge a journal87 cited
  • 2017Science deserves to be judged by its contents, not by its wrapping: Revisiting Seglen's work on journal impact and research evaluation

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

86 cited
  • 2018The Norwegian Model in Norway80 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2024How metric-based performance evaluation systems fuel the growth of questionable publications?16 cited
    • 2023Sorting out journals: The proliferation of journal lists in China15 cited
    • 2023Inconsistent quality signals: evidence from the regional journals11 cited