SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Reliability of citations of medRxiv preprints in articles published on COVID-19 in the world leading medical journals
16 references·2 citing·45 second hop
Reliability of citations of medRxiv preprints in articles published on COVID-19 in the world leading medical journals (2022)Reliability of citations of medRxiv prepr…The evolving role of preprints in the dissemination of COVID-19 research and their impact on the science communication landscape (2021)The evolving role of preprint…Research on Covid-19: a disruptive phenomenon for bibliometrics (2021)Research on Covid-19: a disru…Publication rate and citation counts for preprints released during the COVID-19 pandemic: the good, the bad and the ugly (2021)Publication rate and citation…Preprints in times of COVID19: the time is ripe for agreeing on terminology and good practices (2021)Preprints in times of COVID19…Is rapid scientific publication also high quality? Bibliometric analysis of highly disseminated COVID ‐19 research papers (2021)Is rapid scientific publicati…Day-to-day discovery of preprint–publication links (2021)Day-to-day discovery of prepr…Cross-sectional study of preprints and final journal publications from COVID-19 studies: discrepancies in results reporting and spin in interpretation (2021)Cross-sectional study of prep…Analysis of single comments left for bioRxiv preprints till September 2019 (2021)Analysis of single comments l…Systematic examination of preprint platforms for use in the medical and biomedical sciences setting (2020)Systematic examination of pre…Submissions and Downloads of Preprints in the First Year of medRxiv (2020)Submissions and Downloads of …Proliferation of Papers and Preprints During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic: Progress or Problems With Peer Review? (2020)Proliferation of Papers and P…Characteristics of academic publications, preprints, and registered clinical trials on the COVID-19 pandemic (2020)Characteristics of academic p…Changes in evidence for studies assessing interventions for COVID-19 reported in preprints: meta-research study (2020)Changes in evidence for studi…Medical Preprints—A Debate Worth Having (2017)Medical Preprints—A Debate Wo…Editorial peer review for improving the quality of reports of biomedical studies (2007)Editorial peer review for imp…Editorial peer review for improving the quality of reports of biomedical studies (2006)Editorial peer review for imp…Key challenges in epidemiology: embracing open science (2024)Key challenges in epidemiolog…Can open peer review improve uptake of preprints into policies? Evidence from a causal inference (2023)Can open peer review improve …Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted again (1982)A comparison of results of meta-analyses of randomized control trials and recommendations of clinical experts. Treatments for myocardial infarction (1992)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Improving the peer-review process for grant applications: Reliability, validity, bias, and generalizability. (2008)The elephant in the living room: or extending the conversation about the politics of evidence (2009)Effect of using reporting guidelines during peer review on quality of final manuscripts submitted to a biomedical journal: masked randomised trial (2011)Experimental evidence of massive-scale emotional contagion through social networks (2014)How to fight an infodemic (2020)Using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic response (2020)Ciencia abierta: un modelo con piezas por encajar (2021)Reporting COVID-19 preprints: fast science in newspapers in the United States, the United Kingdom and Brazil (2022)PreprintMatch: A tool for preprint to publication detection shows global inequities in scientific publication (2023)GRADE guidelines: 8. Rating the quality of evidence—indirectness (2011)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015)Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews of Biomedical Research: A Cross-Sectional Study (2016)Lockdown-Related Disparities Experienced by People with Disabilities during the First Wave of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Scoping Review with Thematic Analysis (2021)The Perception and Attitudes toward COVID-19 Vaccines: A Cross-Sectional Study in Poland (2021)The Strategies to Support the COVID-19 Vaccination with Evidence-Based Communication and Tackling Misinformation (2021)New preprint server for medical research (2019)Preprints: Their Evolving Role in Science Communication (2021)Preprints (2022)Systematic Reviews: Synthesis of Best Evidence for Clinical Decisions (1997)ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions (2016)Assessing risk of bias in a randomized trial (2019)Comparison of Clinical Study Results Reported in medRxiv Preprints vs Peer-reviewed Journal Articles (2022)Consistency of covid-19 trial preprints with published reports and impact for decision making: retrospective review (2022)Impact of interventions to improve the quality of peer review of biomedical journals: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2016)The Global Burden of Journal Peer Review in the Biomedical Literature: Strong Imbalance in the Collective Enterprise (2016)Motivations, concerns and selection biases when posting preprints: A survey of bioRxiv authors (2022)Citations, Citation Indicators, and Research Quality: An Overview of Basic Concepts and Theories (2019)Data sharing for novel coronavirus (COVID-19) (2020)Pandemic publishing poses a new COVID-19 challenge (2020)The publishing delay in scholarly peer-reviewed journals (2013)Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus, Dimensions, Web of Science, and OpenCitations’ COCI: a multidisciplinary comparison of coverage via citations (2020)Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus, Dimensions, Web of Science, and OpenCitations’ COCI: a multidisciplinary comparison of coverage via citations (2020)ChatGPT and the rise of large language models: the new AI-driven infodemic threat in public health (2023)The Matthew Effect in Science (1968)An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)Diffusion of Innovations 1 (2019)Evaluating Research Impact Based on Semantic Scholar Highly Influential Citations, Total Citations, and Altmetric Attention Scores: The Quest for Refined Measures Remains Illusive (2023)Interconnectedness between Supply Chain Resilience, Industry 4.0, and Investment (2023)The impact of COVID-19 on global health journals: an analysis of impact factor and publication trends (2023)Alternatives to Peer Review: Novel Approaches for Research Evaluation (2011)Best peer reviewers and the quality of peer review in biomedical journals (2012)A Stronger Post-Publication Culture Is Needed for Better Science (2014)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2021The evolving role of preprints in the dissemination of COVID-19 research and their impact on the science communication landscape556 cited
  • 2007Editorial peer review for improving the quality of reports of biomedical studies312 cited
  • 2020Characteristics of academic publications, preprints, and registered clinical trials on the COVID-19 pandemic130 cited
  • 2020Systematic examination of preprint platforms for use in the medical and biomedical sciences setting112 cited
  • 2006Editorial peer review for improving the quality of reports of biomedical studies74 cited
  • 2020Proliferation of Papers and Preprints During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic: Progress or Problems With Peer Review?73 cited
  • 2021Publication rate and citation counts for preprints released during the COVID-19 pandemic: the good, the bad and the ugly63 cited
  • 2020Submissions and Downloads of Preprints in the First Year of medRxiv62 cited
  • 2021Research on Covid-19: a disruptive phenomenon for bibliometrics56 cited
  • 2020Changes in evidence for studies assessing interventions for COVID-19 reported in preprints: meta-research study54 cited
  • 2017Medical Preprints—A Debate Worth Having52 cited
  • 2021Cross-sectional study of preprints and final journal publications from COVID-19 studies: discrepancies in results reporting and spin in interpretation50 cited
  • 2021Is rapid scientific publication also high quality? Bibliometric analysis of highly disseminated COVID ‐19 research papers

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

47 cited
  • 2021Day-to-day discovery of preprint–publication links43 cited
  • 2021Preprints in times of COVID19: the time is ripe for agreeing on terminology and good practices40 cited
  • 2021Analysis of single comments left for bioRxiv preprints till September 201935 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2023Can open peer review improve uptake of preprints into policies? Evidence from a causal inference6 cited
    • 2024Key challenges in epidemiology: embracing open science4 cited