SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Access to unpublished protocols and statistical analysis plans of randomised trials
16 references·2 citing·37 second hop
Access to unpublished protocols and statistical analysis plans of randomised trials (2022)Access to unpublished protocols and stati…COMPare: a prospective cohort study correcting and monitoring 58 misreported trials in real time (2019)COMPare: a prospective cohort…A systematic review of comparisons between protocols or registrations and full reports in primary biomedical research (2018)A systematic review of compar…Evidence for the Selective Reporting of Analyses and Discrepancies in Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review of Cohort Studies of Clinical Trials (2014)Evidence for the Selective Re…SPIRIT 2013 Statement: Defining Standard Protocol Items for Clinical Trials (2013)SPIRIT 2013 Statement: Defini…SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials (2013)SPIRIT 2013 explanation and e…Many scenarios exist for selective inclusion and reporting of results in randomized trials and systematic reviews (2013)Many scenarios exist for sele…CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updat…CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updat…CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and …CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and …Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias (2008)Systematic Review of the Empi…Discrepancies in sample size calculations and data analyses reported in randomised trials: comparison of publications with protocols (2008)Discrepancies in sample size …Outcome selection bias in meta-analysis (2005)Outcome selection bias in met…Identifying outcome reporting bias in randomised trials on PubMed: review of publications and survey of authors (2005)Identifying outcome reporting…Empirical Evidence for Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized Trials (2004)Empirical Evidence for Select…Investigation of within‐study selective reporting in clinical research: follow‐up of applications submitted to a local research ethics committee (2002)Investigation of within‐study…How can we make sound replication decisions? (2025)How can we make sound replica…Peer review before trial conduct could increase research value and reduce waste (2023)Peer review before trial cond…The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)Publication bias in clinical research (1991)Systematic Reviews in Health Care : Meta-Analysis in Context (2000)Publication Bias in Meta‐Analysis (2005)Choosing Prediction Over Explanation in Psychology: Lessons From Machine Learning (2017)The COMET Handbook: version 1.0 (2017)CINeMA: An approach for assessing confidence in the results of a network meta-analysis (2020)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide (2014)Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research (2014)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation (2015)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials (2001)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)Trial sequential analysis may establish when firm evidence is reached in cumulative meta-analysis (2007)Contour-enhanced meta-analysis funnel plots help distinguish publication bias from other causes of asymmetry (2008)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Meta-analyses involving cross-over trials: methodological issues (2002)Bias in Clinical Intervention Research (2006)Cognitive behavioural therapy for anxiety disorders in children and adolescents (2015)Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) for Chronic Pain (2016)CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updated Guidelines for Reporting Parallel Group Randomized Trials (2010)Reporting of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Randomized Trials (2013)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The impact of outcome reporting bias in randomised controlled trials on a cohort of systematic reviews (2010)Comparing dream to reality: an assessment of adherence of the first generation of preregistered studies (2021)Reducing bias, increasing transparency and calibrating confidence with preregistration (2023)CONSORT 2025 explanation and elaboration: updated guideline for reporting randomised trials (2025)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Critical Appraisal and Data Extraction for Systematic Reviews of Prediction Modelling Studies: The CHARMS Checklist (2014)The CONSORT statement (2019)COSMIN reporting guideline for studies on measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures (2021)Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): Explanation and Elaboration (2015)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2010CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials13,365 cited
  • 2010CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials9,314 cited
  • 2010CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials8,873 cited
  • 2013SPIRIT 2013 Statement: Defining Standard Protocol Items for Clinical Trials7,356 cited
  • 2013SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials6,239 cited
  • 2010CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials1,858 cited
  • 2004Empirical Evidence for Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized Trials1,845 cited
  • 2008Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias1,544 cited
  • 2005Identifying outcome reporting bias in randomised trials on PubMed: review of publications and survey of authors612 cited
  • 2019COMPare: a prospective cohort study correcting and monitoring 58 misreported trials in real time232 cited
  • 2008Discrepancies in sample size calculations and data analyses reported in randomised trials: comparison of publications with protocols201 cited
  • 2005Outcome selection bias in meta-analysis187 cited
  • 2014Evidence for the Selective Reporting of Analyses and Discrepancies in Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review of Cohort Studies of Clinical Trials

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

187 cited
  • 2002Investigation of within‐study selective reporting in clinical research: follow‐up of applications submitted to a local research ethics committee97 cited
  • 2013Many scenarios exist for selective inclusion and reporting of results in randomized trials and systematic reviews78 cited
  • 2018A systematic review of comparisons between protocols or registrations and full reports in primary biomedical research70 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2025How can we make sound replication decisions?11 cited
    • 2023Peer review before trial conduct could increase research value and reduce waste10 cited