SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic and recent developments on the communication of clinical trials, publishing practices, and research integrity: in conversation with Dr. David Moher
16 references·0 citing·35 second hop
Lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic and recent developments on the communication of clinical trials, publishing practices, and research integrity: in conversation with Dr. David Moher (2022)Lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic and re…Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta‐analyses in ecology and evolutionary biology: a PRISMA extension (2021)Preferred reporting items for…The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity (2020)The Hong Kong Principles for …Predatory journals: no definition, no defence (2019)Predatory journals: no defini…Are gender gaps due to evaluations of the applicant or the science? A natural experiment at a national funding agency (2019)Are gender gaps due to evalua…Open Science now: A systematic literature review for an integrated definition (2018)Open Science now: A systemati…Journal article reporting standards for quantitative research in psychology: The APA Publications and Communications Board task force report. (2018)Journal article reporting sta…Recommendations for the conduct, reporting, editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals (2015)Recommendations for the condu…Promoting an open research culture (2015)Promoting an open research cu…Meta-research: Evaluation and Improvement of Research Methods and Practices (2015)Meta-research: Evaluation and…Increasing value and reducing waste in research design, conduct, and analysis (2014)Increasing value and reducing…SPIRIT 2013 Statement: Defining Standard Protocol Items for Clinical Trials (2013)SPIRIT 2013 Statement: Defini…CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and …Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence (2009)Avoidable waste in the produc…Reporting standards for research in psychology: Why do we need them? What might they be? (2008)Reporting standards for resea…Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement (1996)Improving the quality of repo…Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials (1996)Improving the Quality of Repo…Empirical Evidence of Design-Related Bias in Studies of Diagnostic Tests (1999)Why Most Discovered True Associations Are Inflated (2008)Believe it or not: how much can we rely on published data on potential drug targets? (2011)The COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) and how to select an outcome measurement instrument (2016)The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta‐analyses (2016)“Everyone wants to do the model work, not the data work”: Data Cascades in High-Stakes AI (2021)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Systematic Reviews: Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews (1994)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? (1998)Core outcome domains for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations (2003)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updated Guidelines for Reporting Parallel Group Randomized Trials (2010)Reporting of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Randomized Trials (2013)SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials (2013)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (2015)Gender differences in depression in representative national samples: Meta-analyses of diagnoses and symptoms. (2017)The Meaningfulness of Effect Sizes in Psychological Research: Differences Between Sub-Disciplines and the Impact of Potential Biases (2019)Replicability, Robustness, and Reproducibility in Psychological Science (2021)A manifesto for reproducible science (2017)Meta-analysis and the science of research synthesis (2018)Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research (2014)CONSORT Statement for Randomized Trials of Nonpharmacologic Treatments: A 2017 Update and a CONSORT Extension for Nonpharmacologic Trial Abstracts (2017)The COMET Handbook: version 1.0 (2017)Dealing with the positive publication bias: Why you should really publish your negative results (2017)Reporting of stepped wedge cluster randomised trials: extension of the CONSORT 2010 statement with explanation and elaboration (2018)The AASPIRE practice-based guidelines for the inclusion of autistic adults in research as co-researchers and study participants (2019)Fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) in business and management research: A contemporary overview (2022)Infodemics and health misinformation: a systematic review of reviews (2022)ChatGPT and the rise of large language models: the new AI-driven infodemic threat in public health (2023)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2010CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials8,873 cited
  • 2013SPIRIT 2013 Statement: Defining Standard Protocol Items for Clinical Trials7,356 cited
  • 1996Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement3,337 cited
  • 1996Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials3,126 cited
  • 2015Promoting an open research culture2,686 cited
  • 2009Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence2,204 cited
  • 2014Increasing value and reducing waste in research design, conduct, and analysis1,597 cited
  • 2018Journal article reporting standards for quantitative research in psychology: The APA Publications and Communications Board task force report.1,446 cited
  • 2015Recommendations for the conduct, reporting, editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals739 cited
  • 2019Predatory journals: no definition, no defence725 cited
  • 2018Open Science now: A systematic literature review for an integrated definition709 cited
  • 2021Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta‐analyses in ecology and evolutionary biology: a PRISMA extension708 cited
  • 2008Reporting standards for research in psychology: Why do we need them? What might they be?571 cited
  • 2019Are gender gaps due to evaluations of the applicant or the science? A natural experiment at a national funding agency

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

570 cited
  • 2020The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity545 cited
  • 2015Meta-research: Evaluation and Improvement of Research Methods and Practices492 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.