Authorship diversity in hematology‐related Cochrane systematic reviews: Inequities in global representation

Jyotirmoy Biswas · Arkadeep Dhali · Roger B Rathna

5 citations0/0 files storedResearch and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

scientometrics and bibliometrics research Meta-analysis and systematic reviews Diversity and Career in Medicine

Abstract

The need for promoting diversity and equitable authorship representation in academics faces increasing recognition, with some articles pointing out the lack of diversity in specific fields. Currently, there are no such articles scrutinizing the author diversity in the field of hematology. Cochrane systematic reviews are perceived worldwide to be among the highest quality of evidence available, thereby its conclusions often impact policy and practice globally. However, little is known about the current state of authorship diversity in hematology‐related Cochrane reviews.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 5 citations exist upstream.

References

2021The Matilda Effect: Underrecognition of Women in Hematology and Oncology Awards

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.