SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Designing and implementing a research integrity promotion plan: Recommendations for research funders
11 references·0 citing·46 second hop
Designing and implementing a research integrity promotion plan: Recommendations for research funders (2022)Designing and implementing a research int…Using co-creation methods for research integrity guideline development – how, what, why and when? (2022)Using co-creation methods for…Strengthening research integrity: which topic areas should organisations focus on? (2021)Strengthening research integr…Practices for Research Integrity Promotion in Research Performing Organisations and Research Funding Organisations: A Scoping Review (2021)Practices for Research Integr…Important Topics for Fostering Research Integrity by Research Performing and Research Funding Organizations: A Delphi Consensus Study (2021)Important Topics for Fosterin…The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity (2020)The Hong Kong Principles for …Research integrity: nine ways to move from talk to walk (2020)Research integrity: nine ways…The natural selection of bad science (2016)The natural selection of bad …Promoting Virtue or Punishing Fraud: Mapping Contrasts in the Language of ‘Scientific Integrity’ (2016)Promoting Virtue or Punishing…Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics (2015)Bibliometrics: The Leiden Man…The San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment (2013)The San Francisco Declaration…The black, the white and the grey areas - towards an international and interdisciplinary definition of scientific misconduct. (2011)The black, the white and the …Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor (2006)The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact? (2015)Science Mapping: A Systematic Review of the Literature (2017)Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World (2021)Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance (1990)Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance (1991)How Many Participants Do We Have to Include in Properly Powered Experiments? A Tutorial of Power Analysis with Reference Tables (2019)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta‐analyses in ecology and evolutionary biology: a PRISMA extension (2021)Replicability, Robustness, and Reproducibility in Psychological Science (2021)The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations (1974)Boundary-Work and the Demarcation of Science from Non-Science: Strains and Interests in Professional Ideologies of Scientists (1983)Handbook of qualitative research (2000)An Ethics of the System: Talking to Scientists About Research Integrity (2018)Researchers’ interpretations of research integrity: A qualitative study (2018)Expanding Research Integrity: A Cultural-Practice Perspective (2021)A manifesto for reproducible science (2017)The preregistration revolution (2018)Methodology over metrics: current scientific standards are a disservice to patients and society (2021)Prevalence of questionable research practices, research misconduct and their potential explanatory factors: A survey among academic researchers in The Netherlands (2022)A typology of validity: content, face, convergent, discriminant, nomological and predictive validity (2024)Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews (2015)A scoping review on the conduct and reporting of scoping reviews (2016)Development and implementation of research integrity guidance documents: Explorative interviews with research integrity experts (2021)What criteria are used in the investigation of alleged cases of research misconduct? (2021)Co-creating Research Integrity Education Guidelines for Research Institutions (2023)The Delphi technique: myths and realities (2003)Defining consensus: A systematic review recommends methodologic criteria for reporting of Delphi studies (2014)Saturation in qualitative research: exploring its conceptualization and operationalization (2017)Fostering a research integrity culture: Actionable advice for institutions (2022)How Competition for Funding Impacts Scientific Practice: Building Pre-fab Houses but no Cathedrals (2024)Qualitative evaluation and research methods (1990)Qualitative evaluation and research methods (1990)Risk Society, Towards a New Modernity (1994)Education and training policies for research integrity: Insights from a focus group study (2021)Researchers on research integrity: a survey of European and American researchers (2023)Co-creation and the new landscapes of design (2008)Theory of value co-creation: a systematic literature review (2014)Prototyping and the new spirit of policy-making (2017)The museum of errors/horrors in Scopus (2016)Could scientists use Altmetric.com scores to predict longer term citation counts? (2018)Towards wide-scale adoption of open science practices: The role of open science communities (2021)Educating PhD Students in Research Integrity in Europe (2021)Exploring the Gray Area: Similarities and Differences in Questionable Research Practices (QRPs) Across Main Areas of Research (2021)Promoting trust in research and researchers: How open science and research integrity are intertwined (2022)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2015Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics2,816 cited
  • 2016The natural selection of bad science858 cited
  • 2020The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity545 cited
  • 2013The San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment171 cited
  • 2020Research integrity: nine ways to move from talk to walk167 cited
  • 2016Promoting Virtue or Punishing Fraud: Mapping Contrasts in the Language of ‘Scientific Integrity’69 cited
  • 2021Strengthening research integrity: which topic areas should organisations focus on?48 cited
  • 2021Practices for Research Integrity Promotion in Research Performing Organisations and Research Funding Organisations: A Scoping Review37 cited
  • 2021Important Topics for Fostering Research Integrity by Research Performing and Research Funding Organizations: A Delphi Consensus Study36 cited
  • 2022Using co-creation methods for research integrity guideline development – how, what, why and when?23 cited
  • 2011The black, the white and the grey areas - towards an international and interdisciplinary definition of scientific misconduct.22 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work