SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Impact of peer review institute on scientific maturity of Russian journals
6 references·2 citing·34 second hop
Impact of peer review institute on scientific maturity of Russian journals (2022)Impact of peer review institute on scient…Ensuring effective scholarly communication: traditions and innovations of peer review (2021)Ensuring effective scholarly …Peer review: The current landscape and future trends (2016)Peer review: The current land…Medical Journal Peer Review: Process and Bias (2015)Medical Journal Peer Review: …Prepublication histories and open peer review at The BMJ (2014)Prepublication histories and …Changes to Manuscripts During the Editorial Process (1998)Changes to Manuscripts During…Manuscript Quality before and after Peer Review and Editing at Annals of Internal Medicine (1994)Manuscript Quality before and…Национальная сеть научных журналов как система: проблемы до и после санкций (2023)Национальная сеть научных жур…Development of the scientific journals network in Russia: strategic, technological and organizational issues (2023)Development of the scientific…Guidelines for Statistical Reporting in Articles for Medical Journals (1988)The Philosophical Basis of Peer Review and the Suppression of Innovation (1990)Assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials: An annotated bibliography of scales and checklists (1995)The Hazards of Scoring the Quality of Clinical Trials for Meta-analysis (1999)Tools for assessing quality and susceptibility to bias in observational studies in epidemiology: a systematic review and annotated bibliography (2007)An Exploratory Study of Statistical Assessment of Papers Published in the British Medical Journal (1990)Peer review. Crude and understudied, but indispensable (1994)Editorial peer review for improving the quality of reports of biomedical studies (2006)Alternatives to Peer Review: Novel Approaches for Research Evaluation (2011)Are peer-review activities related to reviewer bibliometric performance? A scientometric analysis of Publons (2017)Effect of open peer review on quality of reviews and on reviewers'recommendations: a randomised trial (1999)Effect on peer review of telling reviewers that their signed reviews might be posted on the web: randomised controlled trial (2010)Impact of peer review on reports of randomised trials published in open peer review journals: retrospective before and after study (2014)Peer review in medical journals: Beyond quality of reports towards transparency and public scrutiny of the process (2016)Evolution or revolution? Changing the way science is published and communicated (2019)Does open peer review improve citation count? Evidence from a propensity score matching analysis of PeerJ (2020)The Logic of Scientific Discovery. (1959)The Logic of Scientific Discovery. (1959)Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications (2012)A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in peer review (2017)Managing the Growth of Peer Review at the Royal Society Journals, 1865-1965 (2019)Professional standards in bibliometric research evaluation? A meta-evaluation of European assessment practice 2005–2019 (2020)The Existence of Publication Bias and Risk Factors for Its Occurrence (1990)Publication bias in clinical research (1991)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Publishing Ethics and Predatory Practices: A Dilemma for All Stakeholders of Science Communication (2015)A scoping review protocol on the roles and tasks of peer reviewers in the manuscript review process in biomedical journals (2017)Peer review in a changing world: An international study measuring the attitudes of researchers (2012)Scientific literature: Information overload (2016)What is open peer review? A systematic review (2017)Preserving national language and reaching out English-speaking audience of a scholarly journal (2019)Publication language and the journal scientometric indicators in global citation databases (2019)Journal quality criteria: Measurement and significance (2022)Representation and indexing assessment of the Russian academic journals in Web of Science Core Collection database (2023)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1994Manuscript Quality before and after Peer Review and Editing at Annals of Internal Medicine324 cited
  • 2015Medical Journal Peer Review: Process and Bias125 cited
  • 2016Peer review: The current landscape and future trends71 cited
  • 1998Changes to Manuscripts During the Editorial Process57 cited
  • 2014Prepublication histories and open peer review at The BMJ34 cited
  • 2021Ensuring effective scholarly communication: traditions and innovations of peer review12 cited

Cited by

  • 2023Национальная сеть научных журналов как система: проблемы до и после санкций8 cited
  • 2023Development of the scientific journals network in Russia: strategic, technological and organizational issues8 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work