Rethinking the retraction process

H. Holden Thorp

24 citations0/0 files storedScience

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Academic integrity and plagiarism Publishing and Scholarly Communication Academic Publishing and Open Access

Abstract

published two news stories on alleged image manipulation in Alzheimer's research and unreliable data in an ecology study, sadly showing that the problem persists. Each case involved back and forth among the journal, authors, and institutions to correct the scientific record. Journalists and advocates for research integrity (including courageous whistleblowers) are understandably frustrated about how long it takes to retract papers or at least to post editorial expressions of concern. It's time to devise a more efficient solution.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 24 citations exist upstream.

Cited by

2023What do Retraction Notices Reveal About Institutional Investigations into Allegations Underlying Retractions?2023Enhancing Partnerships of Institutions and Journals to Address Concerns About Research Misconduct 2024How to improve assessments of publication integrity 2023What to communicate in retraction notices?

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.