No open-access location is known for this record yet.
No open-access location is known for this record yet.
The creative uses of new motion capture technology place it in the middle of a hybrid and relatively new field where performance and new media come together – an area of practice in which there is widespread interest and a recent proliferation of collaborative projects (especially since 2010 and the release of the Microsoft Kinect motion-sensing device). However, there is arguably a need for a solid theoretical and conceptual framing for these collaborations between the dance and tech worlds. These are practices which are often under-theorised in terms of meaningful insight from the humanities, and this lack of insight into philosophical, cultural, or historical concepts can lead to work that is technologically gimmicky, superficial, and uncomfortably tagged-on to existing practices. Dance-digital collaborative works also often prove difficult to produce because of incongruities in the underlying principles, methodologies, and languages of each separate practice, and for many choreographers, motion capture still seems either not interesting or welcome as a tool for creating new work (Nesta, 2019). As such, there is a need for a deeper understanding of dance digital performance and installation work as a new medium for choreography, with key structuring concepts that appeal equally to dancer and digital artist, and with a functional vocabulary for inter-disciplinary communication and dialogue. Only then will artists be able to embrace and explore the creative possibilities of the new technologies, and the collaborative practices that go with them. To this end, this article refects on lessons learnt in the development of a specific digital dance performance Malta Calls, produced in collaboration with London-based digital visual artists Prickimage and Studio Aszyk, with ZfinMalta Dance Ensemble and choreographer Mavin Khoo, and with students from UCL and Goldsmiths’ computing and design departments
Loading…
Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 5 citations exist upstream.
Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.
Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.