References

• 2012Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications1,231 cited
• 2005Scientists behaving badly1,089 cited
• 2012Predatory publishers are corrupting open access956 cited
• 2014Publication Pressure and Scientific Misconduct in Medical Scientists221 cited
• 2006Research Misconduct, Retraction, and Cleansing the Medical Literature: Lessons from the Poehlman Case199 cited
• 2015An International Study of Research Misconduct Policies185 cited
• 2022Rise of the preprint: how rapid data sharing during COVID-19 has changed science forever129 cited
• 2016Ban predators from the scientific record126 cited
• 2019Plagiarism and data falsification are the most common reasons for retracted publications in obstetrics and gynaecology99 cited
• 2015Backlash after Frontiers journals added to list of questionable publishers59 cited
• 2021A survey of retractions in the cardiovascular literature38 cited
• 2014Publish or Perish, and Pay—The New Paradigm of Open-Access Journals34 cited
• 2021Violation of research integrity principles occurs more often than we think33 cited
• 2012A consensus statement on research misconduct in the UK26 cited
• 2017Pay-to-view blacklist of predatory journals set to launch