Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Trends in the Use of Promotional Language (Hype) in Abstracts of Successful National Institutes of Health Grant Applications, 1985-2020

14 references·7 citing·47 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1990Introduction to WordNet: An On-line Lexical Database *4,197 cited
2017CORPUS LINGUISTICS: METHOD, THEORY, AND PRACTICE961 cited
2010Reporting and Interpretation of Randomized Controlled Trials With Statistically Nonsignificant Results for Primary Outcomes828 cited
2014Impact of Spin in the Abstracts of Articles Reporting Results of Randomized Controlled Trials in the Field of Cancer: The SPIIN Randomized Controlled Trial366 cited
2017‘Spin’ in published biomedical literature: A methodological systematic review314 cited
2018Misrepresentation and distortion of research in biomedical literature273 cited
2015Language Change269 cited
2015Use of positive and negative words in scientific PubMed abstracts between 1974 and 2014: retrospective analysis237 cited
2015Classification and prevalence of spin in abstracts of non-randomized studies evaluating an intervention137 cited
2020A review of big data and medical research95 cited
2019“It is important to reinforce the importance of …”: ‘Hype’ in reports of randomized controlled trials85 cited
2021‘Our striking results demonstrate …’: Persuasion and the growth of academic hype75 cited
2016Peer reviewers identified spin in manuscripts of nonrandomized studies assessing therapeutic interventions, but their impact on spin in abstract conclusions was limited58 cited
2017

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

How should novelty be valued in science?

52 cited

Cited by

2024Promotional language and the adoption of innovative ideas in science26 cited
2023Promotional Language (Hype) in Abstracts of Publications of National Institutes of Health–Funded Research, 1985-202020 cited
2023Dialling back ‘impact’ claims: researchers should not be compelled to make policy claims based on single studies19 cited
2022Trends in the Use of Promotional Language (Hype) in National Institutes of Health Funding Opportunity Announcements, 1992-20209 cited
2025Hype in science communication: exploring scientists’ attitudes and practices in quantum physics8 cited
2022The scientific communication ecosystem: the responsibility of investigators7 cited
2023Hype, the Responsibility of Authors and Editors, and the Subjective Interpretation of Evidence6 cited