SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Analysis of the efficiency of support programs of Russian universities (2010–2020)
10 references·0 citing·39 second hop
Analysis of the efficiency of support programs of Russian universities (2010–2020) (2022)Analysis of the efficiency of support pro…Russian economic science on the international market of “predatory” publications (2021)Russian economic science on t…Prevalence of potentially predatory publishing in Scopus on the country level (2021)Prevalence of potentially pre…Soft Power: The Concept and Approaches (2017)Soft Power: The Concept and A…Publishing in Predatory Open Access Journals: A Case of Iran (2017)Publishing in Predatory Open …India tops submissions in predatory journals (2017)India tops submissions in pre…Research assessment and recognized excellence: simple bibliometrics for more efficient academic research evaluations (2016)Research assessment and recog…Predatory publishers gain foothold in Indian academia’s upper echelon (2016)Predatory publishers gain foo…India's Scientific Publication in Predatory Journals:Need for Regulating Quality of Indian Science and Education (2016)India's Scientific Publicatio…The UK and Italian research assessment exercises face to face (2013)The UK and Italian research a…“Predatory” Open-Access Scholarly Publishers (2010)“Predatory” Open-Access Schol…Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony (1977)The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields (1983)The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields (2004)Evaluation practices and effects of indicator use—a literature review (2015)Higher education policy: Why hope for quality when rewarding quantity? (2020)Evaluating impact from research: A methodological framework (2021)How Are the Mighty Fallen: Rejected Classic Articles by Leading Economists (1994)Handbook on Constructing Composite Indicators (2005)How Much Better Are the Most-Prestigious Journals? The Statistics of Academic Publication (2005)Like-for-like bibliometric substitutes for peer review: Advantages and limits of indicators calculated from the ep index (2020)Rising Stars: Expert Reviews and Reputational Yardsticks in the Research Excellence Framework (2022)Predatory publishers are corrupting open access (2012)Who publishes in “predatory” journals? (2014)‘Predatory’ open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics (2015)A Critical Analysis of the ‘UGC-Approved List of Journals’ (2018)Detecting a network of hijacked journals by its archive (2021)Profile of authors publishing in ‘predatory’ journals and causal factors behind their decision: A systematic review (2021)Non-state Actors in World Politics (2001)The Paradox of American Power: Why the World's Only Superpower Can't Go It Alone (2002)Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics (2004)Russian language as a factor of soft power in cross-cultural communication: overcoming the crisis (2019)Contemporary Intercultural Communication and China's National Image: A Study of the YouTube Video Platform (2022)Geography of “think tanks” (2024)Who's Afraid of Peer Review? (2013)Predatory publishing as a case of symbolic violence: A critical English for academic purposes approach (2018)Predatory Conferences: What Are the Signs? (2021)Predatory Journals- The Power of the Predator Versus the Integrity of the Honest (2021)Google Scholar, Scopus and the Web of Science: a longitudinal and cross-disciplinary comparison (2015)The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis (2015)A review of the literature on citation impact indicators (2016)ResearchGate and Google Scholar: how much do they differ in publications, citations and different metrics and why? (2022)Balanced scorecard: trends, developments, and future directions (2023)Challenges posed by hijacked journals in Scopus (2023)A walk on the wild side: ‘Predatory’ journals and information asymmetries in scientific evaluations (2018)Boosting research productivity in top Russian universities: the circumstances of breakthrough (2018)A Revolution in the Russian Segment of the International Market of Economics Journals (2021)The expansion of Google Scholar versus Web of Science: a longitudinal study (2013)Predatory journals: Who publishes in them and why? (2018)Questioning Scientific Publications: Understanding how Indonesian Scholars Perceive the Obligation to Publish and its Ethical Practices (2023)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2013The UK and Italian research assessment exercises face to face113 cited
  • 2016India's Scientific Publication in Predatory Journals:Need for Regulating Quality of Indian Science and Education98 cited
  • 2010“Predatory” Open-Access Scholarly Publishers89 cited
  • 2017Soft Power: The Concept and Approaches83 cited
  • 2021Prevalence of potentially predatory publishing in Scopus on the country level75 cited
  • 2017Publishing in Predatory Open Access Journals: A Case of Iran40 cited
  • 2016Predatory publishers gain foothold in Indian academia’s upper echelon13 cited
  • 2016Research assessment and recognized excellence: simple bibliometrics for more efficient academic research evaluations13 cited
  • 2021Russian economic science on the international market of “predatory” publications9 cited
  • 2017India tops submissions in predatory journals7 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work