SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Include or not to include conference abstracts in systematic reviews? Lessons learned from a large Cochrane network meta-analysis including 585 trials
13 references·1 citing·52 second hopsampled
Include or not to include conference abstracts in systematic reviews? Lessons learned from a large Cochrane network meta-analysis including 585 trials (2022)Include or not to include conference abst…How should systematic reviewers handle conference abstracts? A view from the trenches (2019)How should systematic reviewe…Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts (2018)Full publication of results i…Abbreviated literature searches were viable alternatives to comprehensive searches: a meta-epidemiological study (2018)Abbreviated literature search…Systematic review finds that study data not published in full text articles have unclear impact on meta-analyses results in medical research (2017)Systematic review finds that …Grey literature in systematic reviews: a cross-sectional study of the contribution of non-English reports, unpublished studies and dissertations to the results of meta-analyses in child-relevant reviews (2017)Grey literature in systematic…Effect of editors' implementation of CONSORT guidelines on the reporting of abstracts in high impact medical journals: interrupted time series analysis (2012)Effect of editors' implementa…Consolidated standards of reporting trials (CONSORT) and the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published in medical journals (2012)Consolidated standards of rep…Methods for obtaining unpublished data (2011)Methods for obtaining unpubli…Has the quality of abstracts for randomised controlled trials improved since the release of Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trial guideline for abstract reporting? A survey of four high-profile anaesthesia journals (2010)Has the quality of abstracts …Searching for unpublished trials in Cochrane reviews may not be worth the effort (2009)Searching for unpublished tri…CONSORT for reporting randomised trials in journal and conference abstracts (2008)CONSORT for reporting randomi…Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts (2007)Full publication of results i…Reporting of trials presented in conference abstracts needs to be improved (2006)Reporting of trials presented…Systematic review and meta-analysis of preclinical studies (2024)Systematic review and meta-an…Publication bias in clinical research (1991)Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts. A meta-analysis (1994)Positive-Outcome Bias and Other Limitations in the Outcome of Research Abstracts Submitted to a Scientific Meeting (1998)Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases (2010)Chapter 10: Addressing reporting biases (2011)Is working memory training effective? A meta-analytic review. (2012)Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials (1996)Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement (1996)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)Revised STandards for Reporting Interventions in Clinical Trials of Acupuncture (STRICTA): Extending the CONSORT Statement (2010)Impact of Spin in the Abstracts of Articles Reporting Results of Randomized Controlled Trials in the Field of Cancer: The SPIIN Randomized Controlled Trial (2014)Reporting of stepped wedge cluster randomised trials: extension of the CONSORT 2010 statement with explanation and elaboration (2018)Factors Influencing Publication of Research Results (1992)The CONSORT Statement: Revised Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Reports of Parallel-Group Randomized Trials (2001)A scoping review of comparisons between abstracts and full reports in primary biomedical research (2017)Preferred reporting items for journal and conference abstracts of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy studies (PRISMA-DTA for Abstracts): checklist, explanation, and elaboration (2021)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Does use of the CONSORT Statement impact the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials published in medical journals? A Cochrane reviewa (2012)A taxonomy of behaviour change methods: an Intervention Mapping approach (2015)The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity (2020)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2011)How evidence-based is an 'evidence-based parenting program'? A PRISMA systematic review and meta-analysis of Triple P (2012)The CARE Guidelines: Consensus-based Clinical Case Report Guideline Development (2013)Effectiveness of music therapy: a summary of systematic reviews based on randomized controlled trials of music interventions (2014)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)Effectiveness and efficiency of search methods in systematic reviews of complex evidence: audit of primary sources (2005)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder Is Associated With Broad Impairments in Executive Function (2014)Systematic Review of the Literature: Best Practices (2018)Search strategies to identify observational studies in MEDLINE and Embase (2019)How important are comprehensive literature searches and the assessment of trial quality in systematic reviews? Empirical study (2003)Chapter 8: Assessing risk of bias in included studies (2008)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.0.1. The Cochrane Collaboration (2008)A systematic review and meta-analysis of the Test of Memory Malingering in adults: Two decades of deception detection (2019)Risk and protective factors for mental health in elite athletes: a scoping review (2019)Restricting evidence syntheses of interventions to English-language publications is a viable methodological shortcut for most medical topics: a systematic review (2021)Recommendations for examining and interpreting funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials (2011)Catalogue of bias: publication bias (2018)Social media use for nutrition outcomes in young adults: a mixed-methods systematic review (2018)Scientists rise up against statistical significance (2019)The Effects of Sensory Cues on Immersive Experiences for Fostering Technology-Assisted Sustainable Behavior: A Systematic Review (2022)Tools for assessing health research partnership outcomes and impacts: a systematic review (2023)Algorithmic media use and algorithm literacy: An integrative literature review (2024)A basic introduction to fixed-effect and random-effects models for meta-analysis (2010)Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research (2014)Considering bias and conflicts of interest among the included studies (2019)Investigating and dealing with publication bias and other reporting biases in meta‐analyses of health research: A review (2020)Algorithmic fairness in computational medicine (2022)
this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

  • 2007Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts996 cited
  • 2012Consolidated standards of reporting trials (CONSORT) and the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published in medical journals739 cited
  • 2008CONSORT for reporting randomised trials in journal and conference abstracts460 cited
  • 2019How should systematic reviewers handle conference abstracts? A view from the trenches339 cited
  • 2017Grey literature in systematic reviews: a cross-sectional study of the contribution of non-English reports, unpublished studies and dissertations to the results of meta-analyses in child-relevant reviews325 cited
  • 2018Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts307 cited
  • 2012Effect of editors' implementation of CONSORT guidelines on the reporting of abstracts in high impact medical journals: interrupted time series analysis235 cited
  • 2017Systematic review finds that study data not published in full text articles have unclear impact on meta-analyses results in medical research227 cited
  • 2011Methods for obtaining unpublished data107 cited
  • 2006Reporting of trials presented in conference abstracts needs to be improved98 cited
  • 2009Searching for unpublished trials in Cochrane reviews may not be worth the effort95 cited
  • 2010Has the quality of abstracts for randomised controlled trials improved since the release of Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trial guideline for abstract reporting? A survey of four high-profile anaesthesia journals89 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2018Abbreviated literature searches were viable alternatives to comprehensive searches: a meta-epidemiological study72 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2024Systematic review and meta-analysis of preclinical studies26 cited