Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Identifying and managing problematic trials: A research integrity assessment tool for randomized controlled trials in evidence synthesis

7 references·11 citing·37 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2008Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions25,045 cited
2010CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials13,365 cited
2010CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials9,314 cited
2020Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions5,670 cited
2020False individual patient data and zombie randomised controlled trials submitted to Anaesthesia172 cited
2007[The International Clinical Trials Registry Platform - ICTRP].158 cited
2020Check for publication integrity before misconduct113 cited

Cited by

2024Protocol for the development of a tool (INSPECT-SR) to identify problematic randomised controlled trials in systematic reviews of health interventions45 cited
2024Research Integrity in Guidelines and evIDence synthesis (RIGID): a framework for assessing research integrity in guideline development and evidence synthesis35 cited
2024Enhancing the trustworthiness of pain research: A call to action.29 cited
2025Assessing the feasibility and impact of clinical trial trustworthiness checks via an application to Cochrane Reviews: Stage 2 of the INSPECT-SR project28 cited
2024The Individual Participant Data Integrity Tool for assessing the integrity of randomised trials27 cited
2023Trials We Cannot Trust: Investigating Their Impact on Systematic Reviews and Clinical Guidelines in Spinal Pain

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

26 cited

2024Publication integrity: what is it, why does it matter, how it is safeguarded and how could we do better?25 cited

2025INSPECT-SR: a tool for assessing trustworthiness of randomised controlled trials15 cited

2023Predatory journals and their practices present a conundrum for systematic reviewers and evidence synthesisers of health research: A qualitative descriptive study12 cited

2024Tools, techniques, methods, and processes for the detection and mitigation of fraudulent or erroneous data in evidence synthesis: a scoping review protocol9 cited

2023Improving trustworthiness in research in women's health: A collective effort by OBGYN editors7 cited