Deep focus approach for accurate bone age estimation from lateral cephalogram

Abstract

Background/purpose: Bone age is a useful indicator of children's growth and development. Recently, the rapid development of deep-learning technique has shown promising results in estimating bone age. This study aimed to devise a deep-learning approach for accurate bone-age estimation by focusing on the cervical vertebrae on lateral cephalograms of growing children using image segmentation. Materials and methods: We included 900 participants, aged 4-18 years, who underwent lateral cephalogram and hand-wrist radiograph on the same day. First, cervical vertebrae segmentation was performed from the lateral cephalogram using DeepLabv3+ architecture. Second, after extracting the region of interest from the segmented image for preprocessing, bone age was estimated through transfer learning using a regression model based on Inception-ResNet-v2 architecture. The dataset was divided into train:test sets in a ratio of 4:1; five-fold cross-validation was performed at each step. Results: The segmentation model possessed average accuracy, intersection over union, and mean boundary F1 scores of 0.956, 0.913, and 0.895, respectively, for the segmentation of cervical vertebrae from lateral cephalogram. The regression model for estimating bone age from segmented cervical vertebrae images yielded average mean absolute error and root mean squared error values of 0.300 and 0.390 years, respectively. The coefficient of determination of the proposed method for the actual and estimated bone age was 0.983. Our method visualized important regions on cervical vertebral images to make a prediction using the gradient-weighted regression activation map technique. Conclusion: Results showed that our proposed method can estimate bone age by lateral cephalogram with sufficiently high accuracy.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 29 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.