Historical and Practical Considerations regarding Expert TestimonyLearned Hand1901-05-01articleHarvard Law Review147 citationsclosedNo readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.Legal processes and jurisprudenceCriminal Law and EvidenceJury Decision Making ProcessesAbstractNo abstract was published for this record.Citations in this libraryStored only when both papers are in the corpus — 147 citations exist upstream.Cited by2013Are Forensic Experts Biased by the Side That Retained Them?1977The Anthropologist as Expert Witness2015Adversarial Allegiance among Expert Witnesses2005Trial and Error: The Supreme Court’s Philosophy of Science2001A Different Class of Witnesses: Experts in the Courtroom1996Setting Boundaries between Science and Law: Lessons from Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.2006Argument from Expert Opinion as Legal Evidence: Critical Questions and Admissibility Criteria of Expert Testimony in the American Legal System*2001The Law-Set: The Legal-Scientific Production of Medical Propriety