The Perils of Neutrality

Abstract

The concept of analytic neutrality is reviewed with respect to its utility as a technical guideline. Participation of an analyst's personal judgments and affects in clinical work is discussed in relation to differing conceptions of how learning takes place in analysis. The question of what actually protects a patient from being exploited by an analyst is considered. A case example is provided as a basis for discussion.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 142 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.