SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Article Processing Charges may not be sustainable for academic researchers
9 references·0 citing·44 second hop
Article Processing Charges may not be sustainable for academic researchers (2022)Article Processing Charges may not be sus…Equitable Open Access Publishing: Changing the Financial Power Dynamics in Academia (2021)Equitable Open Access Publish…Current market rates for scholarly publishing services (2021)Current market rates for scho…Nature journals reveal terms of landmark open-access option (2020)Nature journals reveal terms …SPARC Landscape Analysis: The Changing Academic Publishing Industry – Implications for Academic Institutions (2019)SPARC Landscape Analysis: The…Drivers of Article Processing Charges in Open Access (2019)Drivers of Article Processing…Article processing charges: Mirroring the citation impact or legacy of the subscription-based model? (2019)Article processing charges: M…Article Processing Charge Hyperinflation and Price Insensitivity: An Open Access Sequel to the Serials Crisis (2019)Article Processing Charge Hyp…Preprints: What Role Do These Have in Communicating Scientific Results? (2018)Preprints: What Role Do These…Data check: U.S. government share of basic research funding falls below 50% (2017)Data check: U.S. government s…Does it take too long to publish research? (2016)Preprints for the life sciences (2016)Ten simple rules to consider regarding preprint submission (2017)Should systematic reviews and meta-analyses include data from preprints? (2021)Examining linguistic shifts between preprints and publications (2022)Metrics fraud on ResearchGate (2024)Predatory publishers are corrupting open access (2012)The academic, economic and societal impacts of Open Access: an evidence-based review (2016)Potential predatory and legitimate biomedical journals: can you tell the difference? A cross-sectional comparison (2017)Crossref: The sustainable source of community-owned scholarly metadata (2020)Journal citation reports and the definition of a predatory journal: The case of the Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI) (2021)The strain on scientific publishing (2024)Measuring contextual citation impact of scientific journals (2010)A study of open access journals using article processing charges (2012)Some modifications to the SNIP journal impact indicator (2013)Article processing charges, altmetrics and citation impact: Is there an economic rationale? (2022)Open Access Advantages as a Function of the Discipline: Mixed-methods Study (2023)The academic impact of Open Science: a scoping review (2025)The Matthew Effect in Science (1968)The Matthew effect in science. The reward and communication systems of science are considered. (1968)Two-sided markets: a progress report (2006)The political economy of academic publishing: On the commodification of a public good (2020)The Roles of Female Involvement and Risk Aversion in Open Access Publishing Patterns in Vietnamese Social Sciences and Humanities (2021)Open access publishing – noble intention, flawed reality (2022)Scientific Utopia: I. Opening Scientific Communication (2012)Open access: The true cost of science publishing (2013)The Oligopoly of Academic Publishers in the Digital Era (2015)Scientific Publishing in Biomedicine: A Brief History of Scientific Journals (2022)Replacing academic journals (2023)The future of academic publishing (2023)Knowledge sharing in global health research – the impact, uptake and cost of open access to scholarly literature (2017)The state of OA: a large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles (2018)Are open access article processing charges affordable for otolaryngologists in low-income and middle-income countries? (2023)Open Access Publishing Metrics, Cost, and Impact in Health Professions Education Journals (2024)Hurdles to open access publishing faced by authors: a scoping literature review from 2004 to 2023 (2025)How do patent incentives affect university researchers? (2019)Responsibly strategizing with the metaverse: Business implications and DEI opportunities and challenges (2023)Why Is Productivity Slowing Down? (2024)Transformative agreements: Six myths, busted: Lessons learned (2021)Ten steps toward a better personality science – how quality may be rewarded more in research evaluation (2022)The oligopoly’s shift to open access publishing (2022)Prestige or Perish: Publishing Decisions in Academic Archaeology (2021)Requiem for impact factors and high publication charges (2021)The Democratisation Myth (2021)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2019Article Processing Charge Hyperinflation and Price Insensitivity: An Open Access Sequel to the Serials Crisis176 cited
  • 2019Drivers of Article Processing Charges in Open Access89 cited
  • 2017Data check: U.S. government share of basic research funding falls below 50%73 cited
  • 2020Nature journals reveal terms of landmark open-access option72 cited
  • 2021Current market rates for scholarly publishing services55 cited
  • 2019Article processing charges: Mirroring the citation impact or legacy of the subscription-based model?44 cited
  • 2021Equitable Open Access Publishing: Changing the Financial Power Dynamics in Academia44 cited
  • 2019SPARC Landscape Analysis: The Changing Academic Publishing Industry – Implications for Academic Institutions41 cited
  • 2018Preprints: What Role Do These Have in Communicating Scientific Results?33 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work