SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
“One might tweet just for money”: Organisational and institutional incentives for researchers’ social media communication and public engagement practices
16 references·1 citing·45 second hop
“One might tweet just for money”: Organisational and institutional incentives for researchers’ social media communication and public engagement practices (2022)“One might tweet just for money”: Organis…Two new Later Stone Age sites from the Final Pleistocene in the Falémé Valley, eastern Senegal (2024)Two new Later Stone Age sites…Scientists’ incentives and attitudes toward public communication (2020)Scientists’ incentives and at…Public communication by research institutes compared across countries and sciences: Building capacity for engagement or competing for visibility? (2020)Public communication by resea…Playing the fields: Theorizing research impact and its assessment (2020)Playing the fields: Theorizin…One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? (2020)One size fits all? What count…Theme in Qualitative Content Analysis and Thematic Analysis (2019)Theme in Qualitative Content …The conflation of motives of science communication — causes, consequences, remedies (2019)The conflation of motives of …Scholarly use of social media and altmetrics: A review of the literature (2017)Scholarly use of social media…Science communication and the issue of trust (2016)Science communication and the…How Are Scientists Using Social Media in the Workplace? (2016)How Are Scientists Using Soci…Organizational Influence on Scientists’ Efforts to Go Public (2013)Organizational Influence on S…Interviews – Learning the Craft of Qualitative Research Interviewing (2012)Interviews – Learning the Cra…Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory (2010)Basics of Qualitative Researc…What Factors Predict Scientists' Intentions to Participate in Public Engagement of Science Activities? (2007)What Factors Predict Scientis…Using thematic analysis in psychology (2006)Using thematic analysis in ps…Incentives and Impediments to Scientists Communicating Through the Media (1997)Incentives and Impediments to…The role of organizations in the public communication of science – Early research, recent studies, and open questions (2022)The role of organizations in …Researching Lived Experience: Human Science for an Action Sensitive Pedagogy (1990)Narrative Inquiry: Experience and Story in Qualitative Research (1999)Qualitative Descriptive Methods in Health Science Research (2016)Thematic analysis of qualitative research data: Is it as easy as it sounds? (2018)A Step-by-Step Process of Thematic Analysis to Develop a Conceptual Model in Qualitative Research (2023)Qualitative evaluation and research methods (1990)Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook (1994)Basics of qualitative research : techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (1998)Older Adults' Reasons for Using Technology while Aging in Place (2015)Thematic Analysis (2017)Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis (2019)Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. (1977)The theory of planned behavior (1991)A power primer. (1992)Using the Internet to Promote Health Behavior Change: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Impact of Theoretical Basis, Use of Behavior Change Techniques, and Mode of Delivery on Efficacy (2010)How scientists view the public, the media and the political process (2011)Scientists’ Prioritization of Communication Objectives for Public Engagement (2016)Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media (2009)Can Tweets Predict Citations? Metrics of Social Impact Based on Twitter and Correlation with Traditional Metrics of Scientific Impact (2011)Bibliometrics: Global gender disparities in science (2013)Do altmetrics correlate with the quality of papers? A large-scale empirical study based on F1000Prime data (2018)Reliability and accuracy of altmetric providers: a comparison among Altmetric.com, PlumX and Crossref Event Data (2018)Exploring Topics in Bibliometric Research Through Citation Networks and Semantic Analysis (2021)The Benefits of Facebook “Friends:” Social Capital and College Students’ Use of Online Social Network Sites (2007)An Introduction to Social Media for Scientists (2013)Fostering public trust in science: The role of social media (2019)Positive and negative impact of social media in the COVID-19 era (2020)Social Media Use for Research Participant Recruitment: Integrative Literature Review (2022)Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups (2007)Content analysis and thematic analysis: Implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study (2013)Understanding Thematic Analysis and the Debates Involving Its Use (2022)A Trend Analysis of the Challenges of International Students Over 21 Years (2023)Designing a Qualitative Study (2023)How Many Interviews Are Enough? (2005)Can I use TA? Should I use TA? Should I not use TA? Comparing reflexive thematic analysis and other pattern‐based qualitative analytic approaches (2020)A worked example of Braun and Clarke’s approach to reflexive thematic analysis (2021)Thematic Analysis (2022)Qualitative Interviews in Applied Linguistics: From Research Instrument to Social Practice (2010)A Method of Phenomenological Interviewing (2014)Qualitative research in healthcare: An introduction to grounded theory using thematic analysis (2015)Science and Environmental Communication on YouTube: Strategically Distorted Communications in Online Videos on Climate Change and Climate Engineering (2019)Understanding the Problem of “Hype”: Exaggeration, Values, and Trust in Science (2020)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions (2016)AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both (2017)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2006Using thematic analysis in psychology193,725 cited
  • 2024Two new Later Stone Age sites from the Final Pleistocene in the Falémé Valley, eastern Senegal23,871 cited
  • 2020One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis?9,627 cited
  • 2010Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory8,310 cited
  • 2012Interviews – Learning the Craft of Qualitative Research Interviewing4,535 cited
  • 2017Scholarly use of social media and altmetrics: A review of the literature572 cited
  • 2019Theme in Qualitative Content Analysis and Thematic Analysis448 cited
  • 2007What Factors Predict Scientists' Intentions to Participate in Public Engagement of Science Activities?355 cited
  • 2016How Are Scientists Using Social Media in the Workplace?282 cited
  • 2016Science communication and the issue of trust229 cited
  • 2020Scientists’ incentives and attitudes toward public communication158 cited
  • 2013Organizational Influence on Scientists’ Efforts to Go Public131 cited
  • 1997Incentives and Impediments to Scientists Communicating Through the Media106 cited
  • 2020Public communication by research institutes compared across countries and sciences: Building capacity for engagement or competing for visibility?96 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2019The conflation of motives of science communication — causes, consequences, remedies83 cited
  • 2020Playing the fields: Theorizing research impact and its assessment77 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2022The role of organizations in the public communication of science – Early research, recent studies, and open questions10 cited