Authorship diversity in Gastroenterology-related Cochrane systematic reviews: Inequities in global representation

Arkadeep Dhali · Roger B Rathna · Jyotirmoy Biswas · Gopal Krishna Dhali

8 citations0/0 files storedFrontiers in Medicine

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

scientometrics and bibliometrics research Meta-analysis and systematic reviews Diversity and Career in Medicine

Abstract

The need for promoting diversity and equitable authorship representation in academics faces increasing recognition, with some articles pointing out the lack of diversity in specific fields. Currently, there are no such articles scrutinizing the author diversity in the field of Gastroenterology. Cochrane systematic reviews are perceived worldwide to be amongst the highest quality of evidence available, thereby its conclusions often impact policy and practice globally. However, little is known about the current state of authorship diversity in Gastroenterology-related Cochrane reviews.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 8 citations exist upstream.

References

2013Bibliometrics: Global gender disparities in science 2018The gender gap in science: How long until women are equally represented?2016Trends and comparison of female first authorship in high impact medical journals: observational study (1994-2014)2021Representation of Women Among Editors in Chief of Leading Medical Journals 2012Assessing gender balance among journal authors and editorial board members 2019Gender Disparities in Invited Commentary Authorship in 2459 Medical Journals 2018Differences in clinical practice guideline authorship by gender 2019The proportion of male and female editors in women’s health journals: A critical analysis and review of the sex gap,

Cited by

2025Cochrane reviews’ authorship has become more gender-diverse but remains geographically concentrated: a meta-research study

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.