Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Multivariate models provide an effective psychometric solution to the variability in classification accuracy of D-KEFS Stroop performance validity cutoffs

16 references·13 citing·28 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2001Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System2,683 cited
2002Base Rates of Malingering and Symptom Exeggeration999 cited
1999Diagnostic Criteria for Malingered Neurocognitive Dysfunction: Proposed Standards for Clinical Practice and Research970 cited
2009American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology Consensus Conference Statement on the Neuropsychological Assessment of Effort, Response Bias, and Malingering869 cited
2005Symptom validity assessment: Practice issues and medical necessityNAN Policy & Planning Committee836 cited
2003Detection of Malingering Using Atypical Performance Patterns on Standard Neuropsychological Tests567 cited
2016Stability in Test-Usage Practices of Clinical Neuropsychologists in the United States and Canada Over a 10-Year Period: A Follow-Up Survey of INS and NAN Members448 cited
2007Assessment of feigned cognitive impairment: A neuropsychological perspective.439 cited
1978Prospects for faking believable deficits on neuropsychological testing.432 cited
2012Performance Validity and Symptom Validity in Neuropsychological Assessment428 cited
2020Multidimensional Malingering Criteria for Neuropsychological Assessment: A 20-Year Update of the Malingered Neuropsychological Dysfunction Criteria385 cited
2020American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology consensus conference statement on uniform labeling of performance test scores381 cited
2008Assessment of Malingered Neuropsychological Deficits

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

352 cited

2015Neuropsychologists’ Validity Testing Beliefs and Practices: A Survey of North American Professionals340 cited

2008Aggregation Across Multiple Indicators Improves the Detection of Malingering: Relationship to Likelihood Ratios315 cited

2007A survey of neuropsychologists’ beliefs and practices with respect to the assessment of effort260 cited

Cited by

2023Cutoff Elasticity in Multivariate Models of Performance Validity Assessment as a Function of the Number of Components and Aggregation Method28 cited
2023Replicating a Meta-Analysis: The Search for the Optimal Word Choice Test Cutoff Continues25 cited
2022Cross-Cultural Performance Validity Testing: Managing False Positives in Examinees with Limited English Proficiency20 cited
2023M is For Performance Validity: The IOP-M Provides a Cost-Effective Measure of the Credibility of Memory Deficits during Neuropsychological Evaluations20 cited
2024The Beck Depression Inventory—Second Edition as a Symptom Validity Test: Importing European Cutoffs to the USA18 cited
2024Seeing Clearly in the Twilight: The Clinical and Forensic Relevance of the Indeterminate/Borderline Range in Multivariate Models of Performance Validity Assessment15 cited
2023Logical memory, visual reproduction, and verbal paired associates are effective embedded validity indicators in patients with traumatic brain injury15 cited
2024Using the MMPI-2-RF, IOP-29, IOP-M, and FIT in the In-Person and Remote Administration Formats: A Simulation Study on Feigned mTBI9 cited
2024The classification accuracy of Warrington’s recognition memory test (words) as a performance validity Test in a neurorehabilitation setting6 cited
2026Visual Analog Scales of Depression, Anxiety, and Pain as Embedded Symptom Validity Indicators in a Mixed Clinical Sample5 cited
2025Utility of the Judgment of Line Orientation as an Embedded PVT in Personal Injury Litigants with Limited English Proficiency4 cited
2024The Limits of the Complex Ideational Material As an Embedded Performance Validity Test – a Case Report2 cited
2026Hopkins Verbal Learning Test – revised process variables as embedded measures of performance validity1 cited