SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
A Framework for Co-Design Processes and Visual Collaborative Methods: An Action Research Through Design in Chile
15 references·5 citing·46 second hop
A Framework for Co-Design Processes and Visual Collaborative Methods: An Action Research Through Design in Chile (2022)A Framework for Co-Design Processes and V…Towards a framework for urban landscape co-design: Linking the participation ladder and the design cycle (2022)Towards a framework for urban…Lost in Co-X: Interpretations of Co-design and Co-creation (2022)Lost in Co-X: Interpretations…The Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance (2018)The Cambridge Handbook of Exp…Institutioning: Participatory Design, Co-Design and the public realm (2017)Institutioning: Participatory…Co-design and urban resilience: visioning tools for commoning resilience practices (2017)Co-design and urban resilienc…Co-production of public space: policy translations from New York City to the Netherlands (2016)Co-production of public space…Quasi-Quisling: co-design and the assembly ofcollaborateurs (2015)Quasi-Quisling: co-design and…On the Relation between ‘Visual Research Methods’ and Contemporary Visual Culture (2013)On the Relation between ‘Visu…Co-designing for Society (2010)Co-designing for SocietyCo-creation and the new landscapes of design (2008)Co-creation and the new lands…Generative Tools for Co-designing (2000)Generative Tools for Co-desig…Crossing the great divide: Coproduction, synergy, and development (1996)Crossing the great divide: Co…Planning through debate: the communicative turn in planning theory (1992)Planning through debate: the …CONSUMERS AS COPRODUCERS OF PUBLIC SERVICES: SOME ECONOMIC AND INSTITUTIONAL CONSIDERATIONS (1981)CONSUMERS AS COPRODUCERS OF P…A Ladder Of Citizen Participation (1969)A Ladder Of Citizen Participa…Unravelling the why: exploring the increasing recognition and adoption of co-creation in contemporary urban design (2025)Unravelling the why: explorin…Spatial design professional-led multi-stakeholders and community participation in co-creating a walkable and inclusive public space (2025)Spatial design professional-l…The process of value setting through co-design: the case of La Borda , Barcelona (2023)The process of value setting …Co-designing for whom? Exploring the benefits of city-led participatory art practices in disadvantaged neighbourhoods of Madrid (2023)Co-designing for whom? Explor…Co-design in the context of universal design: An Australian case study exploring the role of people with disabilities in the design of public buildings (2023)Co-design in the context of u…ASPECTS OF THE THEORY OF SYNTAX (1964)The Tacit Dimension (1997)The experience economy: work is theatre & every business a stage (1999)Anticipating the effects of technological change: A new era of dynamics for human factors (2000)The Value of Codesign (2017)Service robots: value co-creation and co-destruction in elderly care networks (2018)Narration as a human communication paradigm: The case of public moral argument (1984)An advocacy coalition framework of policy change and the role of policy-oriented learning therein (1988)New Directions in Planning Theory (2000)Conflicting rationalities: implications for planning theory and ethics (2003)Post‐political spatial planning in England: a crisis of consensus? (2011)Talking about pictures: A case for photo elicitation (2002)The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research[1] (2006)Multimodality: A Social Semiotic Approach to Contemporary Communication (2009)Digital methods II: Digital-visual methods (2018)Sensible Politics (2020)Drawing as a method of researching social representations (2022)Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action (1992)Economics, Organization and Management. (1993)Production, Information Costs and Economic Organization (1996)Bonds and Bridges: Social Capital and Poverty (2002)Beyond Engagement and Participation: User and Community Coproduction of Public Services (2007)Varieties of Participation in Public Services: The Who, When, and What of Coproduction (2017)The Logic of Collective Action (1965)The Logic of Collective Action. (1966)Co-production, the third sector and the delivery of public services (2006)From Engagement to Co-production: The Contribution of Users and Communities to Outcomes and Public Value (2012)Distinguishing Different Types of Coproduction: A Conceptual Analysis Based on the Classical Definitions (2015)Participation in design things (2008)Embodying, enacting and entangling design: A phenomenological view to co-designing services (2013)Exploring the application of co-design to transformative service research (2018)A review of research with co-design methods in health education (2022)Informal Institutions and Comparative Politics: A Research Agenda (2004)Beyond Continuity: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies (2005)Dissensus: On Politics and Aesthetics (2010)Tales of Institutioning and Commoning (2020)Transdisciplinary research in natural resources management: Towards an integrative and transformative use of co‐concepts (2021)Effective governance of circular economies: An international comparison (2022)Citizen Participation in Decision Making: Is It Worth the Effort? (2004)Varieties of Participation in Complex Governance (2006)Experience-based Co-design and Healthcare Improvement: Realizing Participatory Design in the Public Sector (2015)Co-Production and the Co-Creation of Value in Public Services: A suitable case for treatment? (2016)What is co-creation? An interactional creation framework and its implications for value creation (2017)Self-reported technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) of pre-service teachers in relation to digital technology use in lesson plans (2020)Supporting Human-AI Teams:Transparency, explainability, and situation awareness (2022)Teacher noticing: A systematic literature review of conceptualizations, research designs, and findings on learning to notice (2022)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1969A Ladder Of Citizen Participation17,032 cited
  • 2008Co-creation and the new landscapes of design5,552 cited
  • 1996Crossing the great divide: Coproduction, synergy, and development2,656 cited
  • 1992Planning through debate: the communicative turn in planning theory1,100 cited
  • 1981CONSUMERS AS COPRODUCERS OF PUBLIC SERVICES: SOME ECONOMIC AND INSTITUTIONAL CONSIDERATIONS759 cited
  • 2018The Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance599 cited
  • 2013On the Relation between ‘Visual Research Methods’ and Contemporary Visual Culture380 cited
  • 2000Generative Tools for Co-designing309 cited
  • 2017Institutioning: Participatory Design, Co-Design and the public realm239 cited
  • 2022Lost in Co-X: Interpretations of Co-design and Co-creation90 cited
  • 2010Co-designing for Society74 cited
  • 2017Co-design and urban resilience: visioning tools for commoning resilience practices53 cited
  • 2022Towards a framework for urban landscape co-design: Linking the participation ladder and the design cycle49 cited
  • 2015Quasi-Quisling: co-design and the assembly ofcollaborateurs39 cited
  • 2016Co-production of public space: policy translations from New York City to the Netherlands

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

30 cited

Cited by

  • 2023Co-design in the context of universal design: An Australian case study exploring the role of people with disabilities in the design of public buildings19 cited
  • 2025Unravelling the why: exploring the increasing recognition and adoption of co-creation in contemporary urban design8 cited
  • 2023The process of value setting through co-design: the case of La Borda , Barcelona5 cited
  • 2023Co-designing for whom? Exploring the benefits of city-led participatory art practices in disadvantaged neighbourhoods of Madrid4 cited
  • 2025Spatial design professional-led multi-stakeholders and community participation in co-creating a walkable and inclusive public space2 cited